Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 30;26(8):1161–1163. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.1161

Table 2. Comparison of the TAa thickness between before and after intervention (mm).

Before After 4 weeks After 8 weeks
Exercise group (n= 9) Resting state 2.5 ± 1.3 2.5 ± 1.0 2.7 ± 1.2
Maximal contraction of TA 3.9 ± 1.7 3.7 ± 1.3 4.7 ± 1.8
Maximal contraction of PFM b 3.5 ± 1.7 3.6 ± 1.3 4.5 ± 1.4
Maximal co-contraction c 3.9 ± 1.0 4.1 ± 1.3 5.4 ± 1.4*
Control group (n= 6) Resting state 2.2 ± 0.7 2.3 ± 0.4 2.4 ± 0.7
Maximal contraction of TA 3.6 ± 1.1 3.6 ± 1.0 4.2 ± 0.7
Maximal contraction of PFM b 3.4 ± 1.5 3.7 ± 0.8 3.6 ± 0.8
Maximal co-contraction c 4.1 ± 1.3 4.1 ± 0.8 3.8 ± 0.7

Values are means ± SD. *p<0.05 (before and after 8 weeks). a TA: transverse abdominal muscle, b PFM: pelvic floor muscle, c Maximal co-contraction: maximal co-contraction of both the TA and PFM