Table 3.
Hierarchical regression analyses: Prediction of cognitive decline from Attempt Status
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted R2 | .212 | .208 | .283 |
| Degrees of Freedom Model | 3,132 | 5,130 | 6,129 |
| Degrees of Freedom for each variables | 1,132 | 1,130 | 1,129 |
| MMSE (Time 1) | F=4.16 (p=.03) | F=3.85 (p=.05) | F=4.13 (p =.04) |
| Sex | F=.33 (p=.57) | F=.42 (p =.52) | F=5.1 (p =.48) |
| Education | F=9.94 (p=.002) | F=10.23 (p =.002) | F=13.15 (p <.001) |
| Attempted Suicide | F=.181 (p=.671) | F=.214. (p=.644) | |
| Baseline White Matter Lesions (Right) | F=8.1 (p =.005) |
Note. This analysis demonstrates that a history of attempting suicide was unrelated to cognitive decline from baseline to year 2. However, right (but not left) white matter lesions predicted cognitive decline.