Table 2. Model comparison.
No | Model description | Mathematical expression | AIC | ΔAIC |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | The Ratio (R): linear model | 1527.26a | – | |
2 | The Ratio (R): Emax model | 1528.69 | 1.43 | |
3 | The Ratio (R): sigmoid model | 1503.43 | −23.83 | |
4 | The Ratio (R): logistic model | 1493.96 | −33.3 | |
5 | The Ratio (R): logistic model Hippocampal volume (V): linear model | 1799.68b | – | |
6 | The Ratio (R): logistic model Hippocampal volume (V): Emax model | 1703.77 | −95.91 | |
7 | The Ratio (R): logistic model Hippocampal volume (V): Sigmoid model | 1707.04 | −92.64 | |
8 | The Ratio (R): logistic model Hippocampal volume (V): Emax model ADAS-cog (S): linear model | 3650.75c | – | |
9 | The Ratio (R): logistic model Hippocampal volume (V): Emax model ADAS-cog (S): Emax model | 3652.75 | 2 |
R0 baseline of the ratio; V0 baseline of hippocampal volume; S0 baseline of ADAS-cog; R0=Aβ0/p-tau0
Rmax was fixed at 30, the largest value observed for the Ratio.
a The AICs of model 2–4 were compared with that of model 1;
b the AICs of model 6–7 were compared with that of model 5;
c the AIC of model 9 was compared with that of model 8; −, not included in the OFV comparison.