Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 4;35(9):1111–1120. doi: 10.1038/aps.2014.57

Table 2. Model comparison.

No Model description Mathematical expression AIC ΔAIC
1 The Ratio (R): linear model Inline graphic 1527.26a
2 The Ratio (R): Emax model Inline graphic 1528.69 1.43
3 The Ratio (R): sigmoid model Inline graphic 1503.43 −23.83
4 The Ratio (R): logistic model Inline graphic 1493.96 −33.3
5 The Ratio (R): logistic model Hippocampal volume (V): linear model Inline graphic 1799.68b
6 The Ratio (R): logistic model Hippocampal volume (V): Emax model Inline graphic 1703.77 −95.91
7 The Ratio (R): logistic model Hippocampal volume (V): Sigmoid model Inline graphic 1707.04 −92.64
8 The Ratio (R): logistic model Hippocampal volume (V): Emax model ADAS-cog (S): linear model Inline graphic 3650.75c
9 The Ratio (R): logistic model Hippocampal volume (V): Emax model ADAS-cog (S): Emax model Inline graphic 3652.75 2

R0 baseline of the ratio; V0 baseline of hippocampal volume; S0 baseline of ADAS-cog; R0=Aβ0/p-tau0

Rmax was fixed at 30, the largest value observed for the Ratio.

a The AICs of model 2–4 were compared with that of model 1;

b the AICs of model 6–7 were compared with that of model 5;

c the AIC of model 9 was compared with that of model 8; −, not included in the OFV comparison.