Table 1.
ILD diagnostic criteria6
□IMAGING CRITERIA□ | |
---|---|
□□□Findings that indicate, indicate the possibility of, or do not rule out the possibility of, ILD or interstitial pneumonia | |
□bilateral or unilateral, non-segmental | |
ground-glass opacities | |
consolidation | |
reticular opacities | |
□bilateral extensive centrilobular shadow | |
□bilateral segmental shadow (3 or more segments) | |
□□□Findings that indicate the absence of ILD or interstitial pneumonia (other pulmonary disease or no adverse events) | |
□segmental shadow (locally limited) | |
□bronchiolar lesions (locally limited) | |
□improvement of the shadow by treatment with antibacterial agents | |
□shadow only in a radiated area | |
□enlarged cardiac shadow | |
□positive pulmonary ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scan for pulmonary embolism | |
□progression of cancer (pleural effusion, carcinomatous lymphangiosis and enlargement of a primary focus in the lung) | |
□□□Unable to evaluate | |
□lack of image information | |
□poor quality image | |
□CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS CRITERIA□ | |
□□□Findings that indicate, indicate the possibility of, or do not rule out the possibility of, ILD or interstitial pneumonia | |
□elevated LDH, SP-A, SP-D and KL-6 | |
□effectively treated by steroids | |
□negative culture for pathogens | |
□diagnosis of acute lung injury or ILD in lung biopsy or in the examination of tissue collected at autopsy | |
□□□Findings that indicate the absence of ILD or interstitial pneumonia (other pulmonary disease or no adverse events) | |
□effectively treated by antibacterial agents | |
□detection of pathogens in the blood or expectorated sputum | |
□signs of heart failure | |
□findings of pulmonary embolism | |
□no diagnosis of acute lung injury or ILD in lung biopsy or in the examination of tissue collected at autopsy | |
□spontaneously alleviated while taking Iressa 250mg tablets | |
□□□Unable to evaluate | |
□no clinical data to verify ILD or interstitial pneumonia |