Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Urol. 2013 Oct 19;191(5):1446–1453. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.10.065

Table 2.

Anti-3-[18F]FACBC vs 111In-capromab pendetide diagnostic performance in prostate/bed and extraprostatic sites

Anti-3-[18F]FACBC 111In-Capromab Pendetide p Value
Prostate/bed (91 pts):
 No. true pos 55 41
 No. true neg 12 17
 No. false-pos 18 13
 No. false-neg 6 20
 % Sensitivity (95% CI) 90.2 (79.8, 96.3) 67.2 (54.0, 78.7) 0.002
 % Specificity (95% CI) 40.0 (22.7, 59.4) 56.7 (37.4, 74.5) 0.182
 % Accuracy (95% CI) 73.6 (63.3, 82.3) 63.7 (53.0, 73.6) <0.001
 % PPV (95% CI) 75.3 (63.9, 84.7) 75.9 (62.4, 86.5) 0.530
 % NPV (95% CI) 66.7 (41.0, 86.7) 45.9 (29.5, 63.1) 0.074
Extraprostatic (70 pts):
 No. true pos 22 4
 No. true neg 29 26
 No. false-pos 1 4
 No. false-neg 18 36
 % Sensitivity (95% CI) 55.0 (38.5, 70.7) 10.0 (2.8, 23.7) <0.001
 % Specificity (95% CI) 96.7 (82.8, 99.9) 86.7 (69.3, 96.2) 0.248
 % Accuracy (95% CI) 72.9 (60.9, 82.8) 42.9 (31.1, 55.3) 0.003
 % PPV (95% CI) 95.7 (78.1, 99.9) 50.0 (15.7, 84.3) 0.001
 % NPV (95% CI) 61.7 (46.4, 75.5) 41.9 (29.5, 55.2) 0.021