Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 5.
Published in final edited form as: Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2013;16(0 2):19–26. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-40763-5_3

Table 1.

Comparison of average dissimilarity per curve between proposed (top) and CIVET (bottom) methods, for curves used in correspondence optimization (left) and unseen curves (right)

Curves used in optimization Unseen curves
CingS CS IPS STS SFS SylS CalcS IFS ITS MTOS OPS PostCS PreCS
Proposed 3.42 2.18 7.19 6.79 4.67 3.75 2.31 4.63 8.43 5.00 3.69 6.61 5.24
CIVET 3.49 2.90 10.68 9.95 4.55 3.54 2.08 4.95 11.32 5.41 3.97 8.61 7.15