Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 5.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Protoc. 2014 Jan 9;9(2):263–293. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.012

Table 1. Summary of RNABPs for which CIMS analysis has been performed following this protocol.

The frequency of deletions are reported as the percent of unique CLIP tags with one or more deletions. Since deletions introduced by mapping errors occur in general a much lower rate, these numbers represent a reasonable estimate of deletions introduced by crosslinking. For substitutions, whether they can be introduced by crosslinking is based on several criteria, including if they can provide appreciative improvement to pinpoint the motif. Because of the complication of substitutions caused by sequencing and other types of errors, it is difficult to give a quantitative estimate of the mutation rate caused by crosslinking. The base composition of the inferred crosslinked nucleotide is shown in the last column.

RNABP Motif Data source Deletions (% tags) Substitutions Crosslinked nucleotide (left to right) A,C,G,U)
Nova YCAY 50 Y (21) N graphic file with name nihms602523t1.jpg Deletion
Ago miRNA seed matches 4 Y (>8) N graphic file with name nihms602523t2.jpg Deletion
Ptbp2 UCUY 23 Y (>7) N graphic file with name nihms602523t3.jpg Deletion
Hu U stretch 19 Y (21) N graphic file with name nihms602523t4.jpg Deletion
Mbnl2 YGCY 31 Y (>9) Y graphic file with name nihms602523t5.jpg Deletion
graphic file with name nihms602523t6.jpg Substitution
Lin28 AAGNNGAAGNG 45 Y (16) Y graphic file with name nihms602523t7.jpg Deletion
graphic file with name nihms602523t8.jpg Substitution