. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 5.

Published in final edited form as: Am Econ Rev. 2012 Jun;102(4):1206–1240. doi: 10.1257/aer.102.4.1206

Table 1.

Randomization Design

Community/Hybrid Sub-Treatments			Main Treatments
Community/Hybrid Sub-Treatments			Community	Hybrid	PMT
Elite	10 Poorest First	Day	24	23
	10 Poorest First	Night	26	32
	No 10 Poorest First	Day	29	20
	No 10 Poorest First	Night	29	34
Whole Community	10 Poorest First	Day	29	28
	10 Poorest First	Night	29	23
	No 10 Poorest First	Day	28	33
	No 10 Poorest First	Night	20	24
		TOTAL	214	217	209

Notes: This table shows the results of the randomization. Each cell reports the number of sub-villages randomized to each combination of treatments. Note that the randomization of sub-villages into main treatments was stratified to be balanced in each of 51 strata. The randomization of community and hybrid subvillages into each sub-treatment (elite or full community, 10 poorest prompting or no 10 poorest prompting, and day or night) was conducted independently for each sub-treatment, and each randomization was stratified by main treatment and geographic stratum.