Appendix Table 3.
Results of Different Targeting Methods on Error Rate - Time elapsed between survey and targeting
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| By Income Status | By Detailed Income Status | Per-capita consumption of beneficiaries | ||||||
| Sample: | Full population | Inclusion Error | Exclusion Error | Rich | Middle income | Near Poor | Very Poor | |
| Community treatment | 0.088 (0.072) | 0.098 (0.074) | 0.042 (0.129) | 0.090 (0.086) | 0.102 (0.111) | 0.127 (0.170) | −0.072 (0.178) | 68.008 (78.501) |
| Hybrid treatment | 0.018 (0.072) | 0.074 (0.071) | −0.226* (0.125) | 0.023 (0.081) | 0.117 (0.108) | −0.252 (0.166) | −0.227 (0.176) | 5.139 (90.750) |
| Time elapsed | 0.000 (0.001) | −0.000 (0.001) | 0.001 (0.002) | −0.001 (0.002) | −0.000 (0.002) | 0.004 (0.003) | −0.002 (0.003) | 0.759 (1.552) |
| Time elapsed x Community Treatment | −0.001 (0.002) | −0.001 (0.002) | −0.001 (0.003) | −0.001 (0.002) | −0.001 (0.003) | −0.003 (0.004) | 0.002 (0.004) | −1.358 (1.852) |
| Time elapsed x Hybrid Treatment | 0.000 (0.002) | −0.001 (0.002) | 0.005 (0.003) | 0.000 (0.002) | −0.001 (0.003) | 0.005 (0.004) | 0.005 (0.004) | −0.322 (2.049) |
| Observations | 5595 | 3617 | 1978 | 1791 | 1826 | 1052 | 926 | 1687 |
| Mean in PMT treatment | 0.30 | 0.18 | 0.52 | 0.13 | 0.23 | 0.55 | 0.48 | 366 |
Notes: All regressions include stratum fixed effects. Robust standard errors are shown in parentheses, adjusted for clustering at the village level. All coefficients are interpretable relative to the PMT treatment, which is the omitted category. The mean of the dependent variable in the PMT treatment is shown in the bottom row. All specifications include stratum fixed effects.
*** p<0.01
** p<0.05
*
p<0.1