Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 5.
Published in final edited form as: Am Econ Rev. 2012 Jun;102(4):1206–1240. doi: 10.1257/aer.102.4.1206

Table 3.

Results of Different Targeting Methods on Error Rate Based on Consumption

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
By Income Status By Detailed Income Status Per-capita consumption of beneficiaries
Sample: Full population Inclusion Error Exclusion Error Rich Middle income Near Poor Very Poor
Community treatment 0.031* (0.017) 0.046** (0.018) 0.022 (0.028) 0.028 (0.021) 0.067** (0.027) 0.49 (0.038) −0.013 (0.039) 9.933 (18.742)
Hybrid treatment 0.029* (0.016) 0.037** (0.017) 0.009 (0.027) 0.020 (0.020) 0.052** (0.025) 0.031 (0.037) −0.008 (0.037) −1.155 (19.302)
Observations 5753 3725 2028 1843 1882 1074 954 1719
Mean in PMT treatment 0.30 0.18 0.52 0.13 0.23 0.55 0.48 366

Notes: All regressions include stratum fixed effects. Robust standard errors in parentheses, clustered at the village level. All coefficients are interpretable relative to the PMT treatment, which is the omitted category. The mean of the dependent variable in the PMT treatment is shown in the bottom row. All specifications include stratum fixed effects.

***

p<0.01

**

p<0.05

*

p<01.