Table 3.
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
By Income Status | By Detailed Income Status | Per-capita consumption of beneficiaries | ||||||
Sample: | Full population | Inclusion Error | Exclusion Error | Rich | Middle income | Near Poor | Very Poor | |
Community treatment | 0.031* (0.017) | 0.046** (0.018) | 0.022 (0.028) | 0.028 (0.021) | 0.067** (0.027) | 0.49 (0.038) | −0.013 (0.039) | 9.933 (18.742) |
Hybrid treatment | 0.029* (0.016) | 0.037** (0.017) | 0.009 (0.027) | 0.020 (0.020) | 0.052** (0.025) | 0.031 (0.037) | −0.008 (0.037) | −1.155 (19.302) |
Observations | 5753 | 3725 | 2028 | 1843 | 1882 | 1074 | 954 | 1719 |
Mean in PMT treatment | 0.30 | 0.18 | 0.52 | 0.13 | 0.23 | 0.55 | 0.48 | 366 |
Notes: All regressions include stratum fixed effects. Robust standard errors in parentheses, clustered at the village level. All coefficients are interpretable relative to the PMT treatment, which is the omitted category. The mean of the dependent variable in the PMT treatment is shown in the bottom row. All specifications include stratum fixed effects.
p<0.01
p<0.05
p<01.