. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 5.

Published in final edited form as: Am Econ Rev. 2012 Jun;102(4):1206–1240. doi: 10.1257/aer.102.4.1206

Table 9.

Assessing targeting treatments using alternative welfare metrics

	(1)	(2)	(3)	(4)
	Consumption (r_g)	Community survey ranks (r_c)	Sub-village head survey ranks (r_e)	Self-Assessment (r_s)
Community treatment	−0.065^** (0.033)	0.246^*** (0.029)	0.248^*** (0.038)	0.102^*** (0.033)
Hybrid treatment	−0.067^** (0.033)	0.143^*** (0.029)	0.128^*** (0.038)	0.075^** (0.033)
Observations	640	640	640	637
Mean in PMT treatment	0.451	0.506	0.456	0.343

Notes: The dependent variable is the rank correlation between the treatment outcome (i.e., the rank ordering of households generated by the PMT, community, or hybrid treatment) and the welfare metric shown in the column, where each observation is a village. Robust standard errors are shown in parentheses.

^***

p<0.01

^**

p<0.05

* p<0.1