Fig. 5. : percentage of anophelines (A) and of Anopheles darlingi (B) collected showing relative efficiency of the different anopheline collection methods in relation to total anophelines (A) and in relation to total Anopheles darlingi (B) caught using in three localities in Brazil. For Peixoto Farm, in the first comparison, Shannon cotton with light as attractant was not tested; in Peixoto Farm for the second comparison, the human landing catch depicted value is an average of anophelines caught by collectors 1 and 2. In Jaciparaná, protected human landing catch was tested as a fourth collection method (Table IV).
