TABLE 2.
Sequence relationships between EspF and the EspF-like open reading framesa
EspF homolog | Sequence length (no. of amino acids) | No. of proline-rich repeats | % Identify between sequencesb
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPEC EspF | EHEC EspF | EHEC U-EspF | EHEC M-EspF | |||
EPEC EspF | 206 | 3 | 100 | 87 | X | X |
EHEC EspF | 248 | 4 | 75 | 100 | X | X |
EHEC U-EspF | 337 | 7 | 24 | 28 | 100 | 97 |
EHEC M-EspF | 189 | 5 | 28 | 27 | 55 | 100 |
Pairwise global alignment of the predicted amino acid sequences with the Blosum 62 scoring matrix is shown in normal type. Sequence similarity between EspF and U- and M-EspF occurs primarily in the proline-rich sequences. Pairwise local alignment (boldface type) without gaps reveals the closest sequence relationship between the LEE-encoded EspF of EPEC and EHEC and between the U- and M-EspF sequences. Alignments were performed by using the Align program (Scientific and Educational Software, Durham, N.C.)
X, absence of extended similarity between the respective sequences.