Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 28;111(35):E3659–E3668. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1407207111

Table 3.

Selection of topology models (tests of phylogenetic hypotheses) for miRNA datasets based on Bayes factor comparisons of estimated marginal likelihoods

miRNA study Topology model* ln P(X|Mi) 2lnBFij Description Resulting from§
Amniotes M0 −114.98 (0.03) 17.52 Lepidosaur hypothesis: turtles + lizards B and P
M1 −123.74 (0.14) Archosaur hypothesis: turtles + archosaurs
Amniotes-corrected M0 −126.21 (0.22) 5.17 Archosaur hypothesis: turtles + archosaurs B and P
M1 −128.80 (0.08) Lepidosaur hypothesis: turtles + lizards
Animals M0 −574.67 (0.44) −11.69 (((Acoel 1, Acoel 2), Xenoturbella), (remaining Bilateria)) B
M1 −568.83 (0.17) (Acoel 1 (Acoel 2 (Xenoturbella (remaining Bilateria))) P
Annelids M0 −414.65 (0.11) 11.97 ((Phascolosoma, Nereis), (Lumbricus, Capitella)) B
M1 −420.64 (0.23) (Phascolosoma (Nereis (Lumbricus, Capitella))) P
Bilaterians M0 −552.63 (0.02) 100.92 Myzostomids sister to annelids B
M1 −603.09 (0.26) Myzostomids nested within annelids P
Vertebrates M0 −994.81 (0.14) 0.91 Cyclostome hypothesis: lampreys sister to hagfish B and P
M1 −995.26 (0.13) Jawed vertebrate hypothesis: lampreys sister to jawed vertebrates
*

Topology models refer to various phylogenetic hypotheses corresponding to the description column; see text for details.

The marginal log probability of miRNA datasets (and SE) under the stochastic Dollo model and the preferred relaxed-clock model estimated using path sampling as described in the text.

Two times the natural log of the Bayes factor is twice the difference between the natural log marginal likelihoods estimated under the alternative topological models. Our interpretation follows ref. 46.

§

An indicator for which unconstrained analysis type recovered each topological model. B, Bayesian stochastic Dollo; P, Parsimony.

This is a version of the amniote miRNA dataset from the study of Lyson et al. (19) that has been corrected for sampling error; see text for details.