Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 2;107(5):1042–1053. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.05.050

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Dependence of geometry on free lipid (D0) and apparent diffusion constant (D), encounter frequency, and G production rate. (A) In the free-diffusion case (free), R (purple), R (yellow), and G (blue) are all mobile. In the rack geometry, 80% of R is set as immobile in racks of dimers, whereas the other molecules diffuse freely. Here, R can be part of the mobile fraction (racksRfree) or be part of an immobile rack (racksRin rack). (B and C) Dependency of D0 (first row), D (second row), R-G encounter rate (third row), and G production, given the geometries in A. Note the smaller scale of the y axis between the plots of free lipid and apparent diffusion constant. In B, the D0 of the free-diffusion case is imposed for all geometries. Consequently, the crowding effects of the geometry can be seen in the apparent diffusion constant and the resulting encounter and G-production rates. In C, the crowding effects of the geometry are compensated by imposing higher free-lipid-diffusion constants on the particles (note that the diffusion of G is set to compensate the loss of diffusion contribution from the immobilized R in the R in rack case). As a consequence, apparent diffusion, encounter frequency, and G production are similar in all geometries. All data shown are averages and standard errors of six simulations per scenario. Simulation timescales are 100 μs for diffusion analysis, 1 ms for encounter analysis, and 10 ms for G catalysis. To see this figure in color, go online.