Table 3.
Location | No. of Block Faces Audited | Cronbach's α for Raw Measures | Internal Consistency of IRT Model | Median Level of Latent Disorder, z Scorea (IQRb) | Moran's I | Kriging Parameter |
Cross-Validation Result |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b (Nugget) | Φ (Range) | c (Sill –Nugget) | Residual Mean (SD) | Median Absolute Deviation | ||||||
New York, NY | 532 | 0.48 | 0.86 | 0.07 (–0.55 to 0.42) | 0.041 | 0.19 | 5,000 | 0.14 | −0.002 (0.54) | 0.40 |
Philadelphia, PA | 503 | 0.69 | 0.89 | 0.07 (–0.69 to 0.70) | 0.092 | 0.35 | 10,000 | 0.30 | −0.003 (0.66) | 0.46 |
Detroit, MI | 502 | 0.63 | 0.89 | 0.47 (–0.21 to 1.10) | 0.063 | 0.18 | 3,000 | 0.52 | 0.001 (0.77) | 0.53 |
San Jose, CA | 289 | 0.48 | 0.87 | −0.55 (–0.69 to 0.00) | 0.030 | 0.09 | 1,000 | 0.27 | −0.002 (0.57) | 0.35 |
Overall | 1,826 | 0.62 | 0.93 | 0.07 (–0.69 to 0.51) | −0.002 (0.65) | 0.45 |
Abbreviations: CA, California; IQR, interquartile range; IRT, item response theory; MI, Michigan; NY, New York; PA, Pennsylvania; SD, standard deviation.
a z scores were calculated from the posterior distribution of the disorder IRT model.
b 25th–75th percentiles.