Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 23;65(18):5351–5365. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru306

Table 3.

Comparisons of TaTEF-7A haplotypes in MCC for GN in four environments

Haplotype 02LY 05LY 06LY 10SY
No. Mean ±SE No. Mean ±SE No. Mean ±SE No. Mean ±SE
Landraces
Hap-7A-1 129 51.00±0.99 a 129 40.70±0.63 a 145 54.63±0.79 a 142 52.70±0.76 a
Hap-7A-2 8 39.88±4.17 b 8 40.43±3.20 a 9 47.98±2.73 a 9 46.41±3.09 a
Hap-7A-3 3 37.00±2.65 ab 3 37.47±5.76 a 3 45.67±5.53 a 3 46.20±4.70 a
Modern cultivars
Hap-7A-1 61 50.64±1.47 a 63 46.05±1.11 a 68 53.49±1.16 a 68 52.07±0.99 a(A)
Hap-7A-2 8 49.25±2.86 ab 8 42.05±1.08 a 8 50.08±3.94 a 8 50.90±2.92 a(AB)
Hap-7A-3 10 59.20±2.43 b 12 49.98±2.86 a 12 59.38±4.19 a 11 60.67±2.74 b(B)

02LY, Luoyang (2002); 05LY, Luoyang (2005); 06LY, Luoyang (2006); 10SY, Shunyi (2010)

Upper and lower case letters indicate significant differences at P=0.01 and P=0.05, respectively.