Table 4.
Effect | Full-sample analyses | Selected multigroup analyses | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1: DepSx | Model 2: W.B. | Model 5: race/ethnicity | Model 6: level of ICT use | |||||
White | Black | p Valuea | High ICT | Low ICT | p Valuea | |||
ICT ← Age | −.15** | −.15** | −.15** | −.17** | ns | |||
ICT ← SES | .57** | .55** | .52** | .77** | .002 | |||
ICT ← Cog. | .16** | .14** | .19** | −.05 | .014 | |||
ICT ← I.H. | .02 | .02 | .02 | .03 | ns | |||
ICT ← ADL | .00 | .01 | −.01 | −.03 | ns | |||
ICT ← Soc. | .08+ | .12* | .07 | −.01 | ns | |||
DepSx ← ICT | .02 | .02 | −.05 | ns | ||||
DepSx ← Age | −.09** | −.11** | −.21** | — | −.05 | −.11** | ns | |
DepSx ← SES | −.10 | −.07 | .05 | — | −.09 | −.01 | ns | |
DepSx ← Cog. | .11+ | .05 | −.02 | — | .00 | .14 | ns | |
DepSx ← I.H. | .28** | .27** | .42** | — | .15** | .38** | <.001 | |
DepSx ← ADL | .37** | .33** | .23** | — | .47** | .27** | <.001 | |
DepSx ← Soc. | −.20** | −.20 | −.35 | — | −.10 | −.25** | ns | |
W.B. ← ICT | −.01 | .00 | .08 | ns | ||||
W.B. ← Age | .00 | |||||||
W.B. ← SES | .00 | |||||||
W.B. ← Cog. | −.04 | |||||||
W.B. ← I.H. | −.21** | |||||||
W.B. ← ADL | −.19** | |||||||
W.B. ← Soc. | .38** |
Note. Results of Models 3 and 4 are not presented as there were no differences between groups by gender or age, respectively. Cog. = Cognitive function; I.H. = Ill-health; Soc. = Social integration; DepSx = Depressive symptoms; W.B. = Well-being. Dashes indicate that differences in coefficients were not tested for significance; ns = not significant.
aProbability value for critical ratio (z score) of difference between parameters across groups.
*p < .01. **p < .001.+ p < .05.