Methods | 6 week randomised double blind study | |
Participants | Diagnosis: DSM-III-R major depressive disorder Setting: In- and outpatients |
|
Interventions | 1. Mirtazapine: 15-60 mg/day, N = 66 2. Fluoxetine: 20-40 mg/day, N = 67 Flexible dosing scheduling |
|
Outcomes | The measure used for response and remission in the review: 17-item HAM-D Other measures: CGI-Severity, the Visual Analogue Mood Rating Scale, Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors’ judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: “randomised” Comment: No further information provided. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: “participants were allocated to treatment with either mirtazapine or fluoxetine, according to the centrally prepared randomization list” Comment: No further information about actual central randomization provided |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes |
Unclear risk | Quote: “double-blind” Comment: No further information provided. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes |
High risk | More than 20% of the allocated participants to both of the intervention arms dropped out during the study |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | The response and remission outcomes at the end of acute-phase treatment are provided in the figures as the proportion of the participants who achieved these |
Free of Sponsorship bias? | High risk | The funding source is the pharmaceutical company of mirtazapine |