Methods | 6 week randomised double blind study | |
Participants | Diagnosis: DSM-IV major depressive disorder Setting: Outpatients |
|
Interventions | 1. Mirtazapine: 15-45 mg/day, N = 139 2. Paroxetine: 20-40 mg/day, N = 136 Flexible dosing scheduling |
|
Outcomes | The measure used for response and remission in the review: 17-item HAM-D Other measures: HAM-A, BDI, Welzil-Kohnen Colored Scales, Short Form-36, CGI-Improvement, CGI-severity |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors’ judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: “randomised” Comment: No further information provided. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: The method of concealment is not described. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes |
Unclear risk | Quote: “double-blind” Comment: No further information provided. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes |
High risk | More than 20% of the allocated participants to both of the intervention arms dropped out during the study |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Both the response and the remission outcomes at end of the acute-phase treatment are reported with the proportion of the participants who achieved these |
Free of Sponsorship bias? | High risk | The funding source is the pharmaceutical company of mirtazapine |