Methods | 2 week randomised study | |
Participants | Diagnosis: DSM-IV major depressive disorder, single episode Setting: Psychiatric inpatients |
|
Interventions | 1. Mirtazapine: mean 38.2 (SD 9.0) mg/day, N = 20 2. Reboxetine: mean 6.6 (SD 1.9) mg/day, N = 20 Flexible dosing scheduling |
|
Outcomes | The measure used for primary outcome: Performance in driving simulator Other measures: HAM-D, BDI |
|
Notes | Only information about attrition of the participants is available for the present review | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors’ judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: “randomised” Comment: No further information provided. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: The method of concealment is not described. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes |
Unclear risk | Comment: No further information provided. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes |
Low risk | Less than 20% of the participants dropped out and missing outcome data are balanced in numbers across intervention groups, with similar reasons of missing data across groups |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No useful information in terms of depression severity at the end of treatment is provide |
Free of Sponsorship bias? | High risk | The funding source is the pharmaceutical company of the comparator drug |