Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 9.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7;(12):CD006528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006528.pub2
Methods 2 week randomised study
Participants Diagnosis: DSM-IV major depressive disorder, single episode
Setting: Psychiatric inpatients
Interventions 1. Mirtazapine: mean 38.2 (SD 9.0) mg/day, N = 20
2. Reboxetine: mean 6.6 (SD 1.9) mg/day, N = 20
Flexible dosing scheduling
Outcomes The measure used for primary outcome: Performance in driving simulator
Other measures: HAM-D, BDI
Notes Only information about attrition of the participants is available for the present review
Risk of bias
Bias Authors’ judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: “randomised”
Comment: No further information provided.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: The method of concealment is not described.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes
Unclear risk Comment: No further information provided.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes
Low risk Less than 20% of the participants dropped out and missing outcome data are balanced in numbers across intervention groups, with similar reasons of missing data across groups
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No useful information in terms of depression severity at the end of treatment is provide
Free of Sponsorship bias? High risk The funding source is the pharmaceutical company of the comparator drug