Methods | 14 week randomised study | |
Participants | Diagnosis: DSM-IV major depressive disorder Setting: Outpatients |
|
Interventions | 1. Mirtazapine: 15-60 mg/day, N = 114 2. Nortriptyline: 25-150 mg/day, N = 121 Flexible dosing scheduling |
|
Outcomes | The measure used for response and remission in the review: 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Other measures: 17-item HAM-D, Short-Form Health Survey, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire, Work and Social Adjustment Scale, Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors’ judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: “random assignment” Comment: No further information provided. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: The method of concealment is not described. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes |
High risk | Comment: Both the participants and the clinicians knew the treatment status |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes |
Unclear risk | No information of attrition to permit judgement is provided. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Both the response and the remission outcomes are reported in figures with the proportion of the participants who achieved these |
Free of Sponsorship bias? | Low risk | The funding source is National Institute of Mental Health. |