Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Jun 11;126(1):98–104.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.04.017

Table 2.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients treated for anaphylactic shock in Florida EDs for the years 2005 and 2006 (n = 2,751)

Type of Case Definition
Method I
(n = 1149)
Method II-Algorithm
(n = 1602)
p-value
Number (Percentage) Number (Percentage)
Demographic Variables
Total charges* $1,307 ($1422) $1,257 ($1484) 0.17
Age in years** 35 (21.97) 41 (20.72) < 0.0001
Male 507 (44) 666 (42) 0.08
Female 642 (56) 936 (58)
White 914 (81) 1276 (80) 0.61
Black 176 (16) 260 (16)
Other 44 (4) 52 (3)
Hispanic 175 (15) 216 (14) 0.18
Non-Hispanic 959 (85) 1372 (86)
Commercial Insurance 603 (52) 766 (48) 0.04^
Government Insurance 313 (27) 497 (31)
No Insurance 233 (20) 339 (21)
Clinical Variables
Asthma 91 (8) 129 (8) 0.90
Heart disease 134 (12) 310 (19) < 0.0001
Shortness of breath (786.05) 81 (7) 638 (40) < 0.0001
Tachypea (786.06) 2 (0) 5 (0) 0.71
Wheezing (786.07) 26 (2) 173 (11) < 0.0001
COPD (491.2, 496) 10 (1) 22 (1) 0.23
Venom (ecode) 36 (3) 255 (16) < 0.0001
Food related 451 (39) 46 (3) < 0.0001
Medical related 109 (9) 119 (7) 0.05
Epinephrine administration 111 (10) 180 (11) 0.19

14 individuals in Method II and 15 in the Method I did not provide race/ethnicity.

*

Reported median (interquartile range) used mann-whitney-wilcoxon test

**

Reported mean (standard deviation) used z-test. Note: when cases with food-related triggers are removed there is still a difference between mean ages (p=0.01).

^

There is a difference between commercial and governmental insurance p=0.01.