Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 28;66(5):1218–1227. doi: 10.1002/art.38374

Table 3.

Comparison of the fixed effects and random effects of 3 different models for predicting Fmed based on the EAM alone or using combinations of the EAM and the EFM*

Fmed = a + b × EAM Fmed = a + b × EAM + c × EFM Fmed = a + b × EAM + c × |EFM|



a [%BW] b [1/height] RMSE [%BW] a [%BW] b [1/height] c [1/height] RMSE [%BW] a [%BW] b [1/height] c [1/height] RMSE [%BW]
Fixed effects 80 34 67 32 1 64 33 5
Random effects
 Activity
  Walking 4 3 31 18 5 −13 30 26 3 −12 31
  Stair climbing 25 1 34 31 4 −1 35 31 3 −3 34
  Stair descending −7 5 34 13 4 −2 33 10 5 −5 33
  Sit-to-stand 5 −18 32 −14 −10 8 22 −18 −8 6 19
  Stand-to-sit 1 −3 29 −3 −13 8 23 −2 −12 5 23
  Squat −1 3 23 −13 0 6 20 −16 1 3 19
  Squat varus −1 2 18 −12 1 8 14 −18 2 6 13
  Squat valgus −8 −8 18 −21 −10 7 15 −26 −9 4 13
  Weight transfer −7 7 31 −2 8 −6 29 5 7 −3 30
  One-legged stance −11 10 43 1 11 −17 36 6 8 −1 40
*

Errors in the model predictions are reported as the root mean square error (RMSE). Fmed = medial tibiofemoral contact force; a, b, c, = free regression parameters; EAM = external knee adduction moment; EFM = external knee flexion moment; %BW = % body weight.