Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 9.
Published in final edited form as: Hand Clin. 2014 May;30(2):239–vii. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2014.02.001

Table 2. Summary of different features of soft tissue reconstructive techniques of the upper extremity.

Method of reconstruction Different characteristics of various methods of soft-tissue reconstruction
Coverage of bare tendons, bone & joints Size of defect coverage Skin quality Sensory recovery* Number of procedures required+ Mean duration of postoperative limb immobilization required Level of difficulty Donor-site deformity Cost
Split-thickness skin graft (STSG) No Small to large sized defects Average No Single 7-10 days Easy to perform Yes $
Full thickness skin graft (FTSG) No Small defects Good No Single 7-10 days Easy to perform Yes (minimal scarring) $
Dermal Substitutes Yes Small to large sized defects Good-Very good Suboptimal recovery One to two procedures depending on the use of a single or two-stage dermal substitute 7-21 days Easy to perform. However there is a learning curve to perform satisfactorily No $$$$
Local Flaps Yes Small defects Excellent Yes One or two procedures depends on type of flap used 7 days Average difficulty Yes (minimal scarring) $
Pedicled and regional Flaps Yes Small to large sized defects Very good No Two or more 21 days Average difficulty Yes $$
Microvascular free flaps Yes Large sized defects Very good No Usually single but may require revision procedures 7 days Difficult, requires adequate expertise and training to achieve good results Yes (muscle flaps> fasciocutaneous flaps) $$$

Tendons, bones and cartilage without paratenon, periosteum and perichondrium.

*

Not including specialized sensation of the palm of the hand

+

Not including secondary or revision surgery.

Single stage dermal substitutes requires shorter period of limb immobilization.