Table 4. Estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for clinically determined and self-reported dental caries (DMFT ≥1) according to gender, adolescent's schooling, household income and visit to dentist in previous year in 1993 birth cohort at 18 years of age, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, 2012.
Sensitivity % (95% CI) | Specificity % (95% CI) | PPV1 % (95% CI) | NPV2 % (95% CI) | Accuracy | |
Female | 87.3 (83.2; 90.7) | 70.7(62.7; 77.8) | 86.8 (82.7; 90.2) | 71.6 (63.6; 78.7) | 82.1 |
Male | 76.4 (71.5; 80.9) | 84.1 (78.1; 89.0) | 89.5 (85.4; 92.8) | 66.8 (60.4; 72.8) | 78.2 |
Lesser schooling of adolescent (≤4 years of study) | 75.0 (56.8; 88.5) | 65.0 (40.8; 84.6) | 77.4 (58.9; 90.4) | 61.9 (38.4; 81.9) | 71.1 |
Greater schooling of adolescent (≥12 years of study) | 82.6 (61.2; 95.0) | 92.6 (75.7; 99.1) | 90.5 (69.6; 98.8) | 86.2 (68.2; 96.1) | 88.0 |
Lower household income (1st tertile) | 84.5 (79.8; 88.5) | 75.4 (67.2; 82.4) | 87.9 (83.4; 91.5) | 69.7 (61.5; 77.0) | 83.9 |
Higher household income (3rd tertile) | 78.0 (71.3; 83.8) | 83.5 (74.9; 90.1) | 89.3 (83.4; 93.6) | 68.3 (59.4; 76.3) | 80.0 |
Visited dentist in previous year | 81.9 (77.6; 85.6) | 78.0 (70.7; 84.2) | 89.8 (86.1; 92.8) | 64.6 (57.4; 71.3) | 80.7 |
Did not visit dentist in previous year | 80.8 (75.9; 86.0) | 78.2 (71.4; 84.0) | 85.9 (81.3; 89.8) | 72.5 (65.7; 78.7) | 80.4 |
positive predictive value.
negative predictive value.