Table 4.
Comparison of risk factors for GC in the literature
GC study | Risk factors (P-value for predicting GC) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Author, yearref | No. (%) with GC | Total no. with AC | Age (years) | Gender | DM | HR |
Fagan, 200312 | 40% | 113 | >51 (0.04)a | NS | Yes (0.045)b | NS |
Nguyen, 200411 | 18% | 98 | NS | NS | Yes (<0.1)b | NS |
Aydin, 20062 | 10% | 203 | 59 versus 51c (0.001)a | Male (0.005)b | Yes (0.005)b | NS |
Yacoub, 201010 | 28% | 245 | >45 (0.019)b | Male (0.001)b | NS | >90 (0.007)b |
Nikfarjam, 20113 | 37% | 290 | 69 versus 57 (0.001)a | Male (0.001)a | Yes (0.04)a | >100 (0.001)a |
Falor, 201213 | 23% | 391 | 46 versus 39 (0.007)a | Male (0.001)b | NS | >90 (0.02)b |
Current study, 2013 | 6.7% | 5243 | >45 (0.001), >65 (0.001)b | Male (0.001)a | NS | >90 (0.02)b |
Risk factors (P-value for predicting GC) | Scoring system | |||||
WBC (×1000) | ALT | AP | Na | GBWT (mm) | PCCF | |
>15 (0.001)b | >50 (0.035)b | >200 (0.026)b | NS | NS | Yes (0.11)b | No |
>15 (<0.1)b | >50 (<0.1)b | >200 (<0.1)b | NS | NS | Yes (<0.1)b | No |
>15 (0.001)b | 56 versus 43 (0.02)a | 268 versus 222 (0.02)a | NS | 6.2 versus 4.6 (0.0001)a | Yes (0.0001)a | No |
>13 (0.005)b | NS | NS | NS | >4.5 (0.014)b | NS | Yes |
13 versus 11 (0.001)a | 26 versus 43 (0.001)a | NS | NS | ND (0.03)a | NS | No |
>14 (0.001)b | NS | NS | ≤135 (0.04)b | NS | NS | No |
>13 (0.001)b | NS | NS | NS | >4.5 (0.007)b | Yes (0.001)a | Yes |
In univariate analysis only
Confirmed in multivariate analaysis
X versus Y signifies GC versus non-GC.
ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AP, alkaline phosphatase; DM, diabetes mellitus; GBWT, gallbladder wall thickening; HR, heart rate; ND, not defined; NS, not significant or not shown; PCCF, pericholecystic fluid; WBC, white blood cell count.