Table 2.
Number of reviewed cases and percentage in each diagnostic category of each hematopathologist
| Hematopathologist a | Average | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | ||
| Numbers of reviewed cases b | 117 | 105 | 56 | 94 | 88 | 114 | 81 | 94 (80%) |
| Category of diagnoses c (%) | ||||||||
| 1. Concordance | 84 | 84 | 86 | 92 | 90 | 84 | 85 | 86 |
| 2. Minor discordance | 13 | 12 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 14 | 6 | 10 |
| 3. Major discordance | 3 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 3.5 |
| 4. Serious discordance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.3 |
aSeven hematopathologists were blindly coded as A to G.
bNumbers of reviewed cases are numbers of cases that each hematopathologist could individually review within a 6-hours period.
cPlease see the description of each diagnostic category in Table 1.