Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 26;306(12):R901–R907. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00185.2013

Table 1.

Comparison of passive, diastolic, and systolic diameters of bovine mesenteric postnodal lymphatic vessels in Sham and MVH groups

Transmural Pressure, cmH2O Passive Diameter, mm Diastolic Diameter, mm Systolic Diameter, mm
Sham Group
3 3.64 ± 0.37 3.38 ± 0.39 1.87 ± 0.27
6 3.74 ± 0.37 3.51 ± 0.39 2.15 ± 0.29
9 3.79 ± 0.38 3.59 ± 0.39 2.49 ± 0.29
12 3.80 ± 0.39 3.66 ± 0.38 2.89 ± 0.30
15 3.84 ± 0.40 3.71 ± 0.36 3.14 ± 0.30
MVH Group
3 4.23 ± 0.32 4.06 ± 0.31 2.15 ± 0.26
6 4.30 ± 0.32 4.21 ± 0.31 2.93 ± 0.30
9 4.34 ± 0.34 4.27 ± 0.33 3.40 ± 0.35
12 4.36 ± 0.35 4.30 ± 0.35 3.77 ± 0.35
15 4.39 ± 0.34 4.31 ± 0.35 4.00 ± 0.34

Data are presented as means ± SE.

MVH, microvascular hypertension.