Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Nov 30;143(1):181–187. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2771-z

Table 1.

Per-allele OR and 95% CI for the association of established cancer susceptibility loci and breast cancer risk by E-cadherin tumor expression for two selected SNPs

Locus (Gene) SNP MAFa Study Controls, N Case-control analyses
Case-only
N OR (95% CI) N OR (95% CI) P-hetb
E-cad low tumors vs. controls E-cad high tumors vs. controls
1p11.2 (NOTCH2/FCGR1B) rs11249433 (A/G)c 0.369 PBCS 2340 250 1.30 (1.08–1.56) 989 1.06 (0.95–1.18) 0.05
0.409 SEARCH 6714 468 1.30 (1.14–1.49) 1524 1.11 (1.03–1.21) 0.04
Combined 9054 718 1.30 (1.161.44) 2513 1.09 (1.021.16) 0.004
6q25.1 (ESR1) rs2046210 (G/A) 0.294 PBCS 2291 239 1.43 (1.18–1.75) 949 1.06 (0.94–1.19) 0.007
0.354 SEARCH 6716 465 0.96 (0.83–1.10) 1517 1.16 (1.07–1.26) 0.01
Combined 9007 704 1.18 (0.711.64) 2466 1.12 (1.021.21) 0.84
a

Minor allele frequency over all controls in PBCS.

b

Case-only P-value was used to test for heterogeneity (Phet) and was estimated using a polytomous logistic regression model with E-cadherin (E-cad) status as the outcome adjusted for age in 5-year categories.

c

Major/minor allele. Fixed effects meta-analysis by study (PBCS and SEARCH) was used to calculate the combined OR, 95% CI and Phet.