Table 1.
Locality | Code | Date | Host | N | Na | Ne | Ho | He | Nei | Ar | Fis | p Values | Pwil |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Xining, Qinghai | QH1 | 2011.8 | Eggplant | 25 | 2.2857 | 1.6987 | 0.3200 | 0.3413 | 0.3345 | 2.0350 | −0.0094 | 0.4250 | 0.9844 |
Xining, Qinghai | QH2 | 2012.9 | Eggplant | 25 | 2.1429 | 1.5074 | 0.3029 | 0.3144 | 0.3081 | 1.9549 | 0.0460 | 0.5966 | 0.9453 |
Xining, Qinghai | QH3 | 2012.9 | Kidney bean | 25 | 2.1429 | 1.4428 | 0.2229 | 0.2499 | 0.2449 | 1.7926 | 0.1648 | 0.3768 | 0.6875 |
Baiyin, Gansu | GS1 | 2011.8 | Tomato | 25 | 2.5714 | 1.8688 | 0.3143 | 0.3774 | 0.3698 | 2.2439 | 0.1919 | 0.1261 | 0.8906 |
Baiyin, Gansu | GS2 | 2011.8 | Eggplant | 25 | 2.8571 | 1.7495 | 0.3386 | 0.3849 | 0.3771 | 2.2721 | 0.0916 | 0.2804 | 0.5000 |
Yinchuan, Ningxia | NX | 2012.9 | Eggplant | 24 | 3.1429 | 1.5985 | 0.2229 | 0.3277 | 0.3208 | 2.2344 | 0.3338 | 0.2016 | 0.0547 |
Xishuangbanna, Yunnan | YN1 | 2011.9 | Tomato | 27 | 3.0000 | 1.9985 | 0.4308 | 0.4563 | 0.4478 | 2.5229 | 0.0496 | 0.2631 | 0.9219 |
Xishuangbanna, Yunnan | YN2 | 2011.9 | Eggplant | 27 | 3.0000 | 2.1305 | 0.4550 | 0.4836 | 0.4746 | 2.6001 | 0.0329 | 0.4914 | 0.9453 |
Yuxi, Yunnan | YN3 | 2012.1 | Kidney bean | 22 | 5.0000 | 2.4447 | 0.2993 | 0.5061 | 0.4945 | 3.6000 | 0.4247 | 0.1700 | 0.1484 |
Guiyang, Guizhou | GZ1 | 2011.7 | Tomato | 27 | 2.5714 | 1.6685 | 0.4011 | 0.3651 | 0.3583 | 2.2656 | −0.0462 | 0.4125 | 0.9219 |
Guiyang, Guizhou | GZ2 | 2011.8 | Eggplant | 24 | 3.1429 | 1.5665 | 0.3003 | 0.3121 | 0.3055 | 2.2867 | −0.0203 | 0.5758 | 0.0156 |
Yuncheng, Shanxi | SX | 2011.1 | Tomato | 12 | 3.4286 | 2.0678 | 0.3693 | 0.4408 | 0.4189 | 3.0106 | 0.1476 | 0.1863 | 0.3438 |
Jinan, Shandong | SD | 2012.9 | Cucumber | 25 | 4.4286 | 1.9886 | 0.3026 | 0.4307 | 0.4219 | 3.0181 | 0.2721 | 0.1771 | 0.0195 |
Fushun, Liaoning | LN | 2011.1 | Tomato | 27 | 3.4286 | 1.8539 | 0.2116 | 0.3700 | 0.3631 | 2.5496 | 0.2853 | 0.2208 | 0.2891 |
Changchun, Jilin | JL1 | 2012.8 | Tomato | 24 | 2.4286 | 1.6735 | 0.3323 | 0.3495 | 0.3421 | 2.1044 | 0.0699 | 0.3141 | 0.9453 |
Changchun, Jilin | JL2 | 2012.8 | Cucumber | 24 | 3.0000 | 1.7421 | 0.2307 | 0.3181 | 0.3113 | 2.3799 | 0.2063 | 0.1560 | 0.2813 |
Changchun, Jilin | JL3 | 2012.9 | Pepper | 25 | 2.4286 | 1.4949 | 0.1068 | 0.2324 | 0.2276 | 2.0003 | 0.5812 | 0.0505 | 0.0781 |
Mean | - | - | - | - | 3.0000 | 1.7938 | 0.3036 | 0.3683 | 0.3600 | 2.4042 | - | - | - |
For each sample, the following genetic diversity indexes are indicated: sampling site, population code, date of collection, host plant, sample size (N), average number of alleles per locus (Na), the effective number of alleles (Ne), the observed heterozygosity (Ho), the expected heterozygosity (He), Nei’s expected heterozygosity (Nei), allelic richness (Ar), estimator of the fixation index (Fis), and the Wilcoxon test p value for heterozygosity deficit, compared to expectations at mutation-drift equilibrium (Pwil).