Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 31;15(8):13514–13528. doi: 10.3390/ijms150813514

Table 2.

Comparison of the within-population tests for heterozygosity excess tests using the models IAM (infinite allele model), TPM (two-phase mutation model), and SMM (stepwise mutation model) in BOTTLENECK.

Locality Population Code Heterozygosity Excess p Values
IAM TPM SMM
Xining, Qinghai QH1 0.0313 0.0313 0.1094
Xining, Qinghai QH2 0.0234 0.0781 0.2813
Xining, Qinghai QH3 0.3125 0.4063 0.8906
Baiyin, Gansu GS1 0.0469 0.3125 0.4063
Baiyin, Gansu GS2 0.3438 0.5781 0.5781
Yinchuan, Ningxia NX 0.7109 0.9609 0.9883
Xishuangbanna, Yunnan YN1 0.0391 0.2188 0.2813
Xishuangbanna, Yunnan YN2 0.0195 0.1484 0.3438
Yuxi, Yunnan YN3 0.7656 0.9453 0.9883
Guiyang, Guizhou GZ1 0.0547 0.2188 0.4219
Guiyang, Guizhou GZ2 0.9453 0.9922 1.0000
Yuncheng, Shanxi SX 0.4219 0.7188 0.9453
Jinan, Shandong SD 0.9453 0.9883 0.9922
Fushun, Liaoning LN 0.7109 0.7656 0.9727
Changchun, Jilin JL1 0.0234 0.0781 0.5000
Changchun, Jilin JL2 0.5781 0.7813 0.9609
Changchun, Jilin JL3 0.7188 0.9453 0.9922

Bolded numbers indicate they are significant at p < 0.05.