Table 1. Clinical and Demographic Cohort Characteristicsa.
Characteristic | All Appendectomy (n = 9048) |
Nonperforated (n = 7233) |
Perforated (n = 1421) |
P Value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Male, % | 52.0 | 52.1 | 55.3 | .03 |
Age, mean (SD), y | 39.8 (16.6) | 38.2 (15.8) | 48.8 (17.6) | <.001 |
Age distribution, %, y | ||||
18-29 | 34.6 | 37.5 | 17.5 | <.001 |
30-39 | 20.8 | 22.0 | 14.2 | <.001 |
40-49 | 16.3 | 16.6 | 17.7 | .16 |
50-59 | 14.0 | 12.8 | 21.3 | <.001 |
60-69 | 8.9 | 7.4 | 17.2 | <.001 |
≥70 (max = 97) | 5.4 | 4.2 | 12.0 | <.001 |
WBC count, mean (SD) | 13.3 (4.8) | 13.2 (4.3) | 14.5 (4.8) | <.001 |
Comorbidity index score, % | ||||
0 | 86.1 | 87.1 | 80.4 | <.001 |
1 | 11.3 | 10.7 | 14.1 | <.001 |
2 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 3.2 | <.001 |
≥3 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 2.3 | <.001 |
Race, % | ||||
White | 71.7 | 71.6 | 72.4 | .52 |
African American | 2.7 | 2.7 | 8 | .06 |
Asian | 5.3 | 5.4 | 4.3 | .08 |
American Indian/Alaskan | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.1 | .23 |
Hawaiian/Pacific Islander | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 8 |
Unknown | 19.0 | 18.8 | 20.00 | .31 |
Ethnicity, % | ||||
White, non-Hispanic | 65.4 | 65.2 | 66.7 | .26 |
White, Hispanic | 8.0 | 8. | 7.5 | .45 |
Minority, non-Hispanic | 9.3 | 9.5 | 7.5 | .02 |
Minority, Hispanic | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | .64 |
Unknown | 17.3 | 17.2 | 18.2 | .36 |
Insurance, % | ||||
Private | 61.8 | 63.6 | 54.2 | <.001 |
Medicare | 8. | 6.4 | 17.0 | <.001 |
Medicaid | 8.4 | 8.2 | 8.2 | .96 |
Uninsured, self-pay, unknown |
18.1 | 18.0 | 18.0 | .97 |
Other government program |
3.6 | 3.9 | 2.7 | .03 |
Preoperation imaging | 93.3 | 93.9 | 93.9 | .97 |
Negative appendectomy | 4.1 | NA | NA | NA |
Perforation | 15.8 | NA | NA | NA |
Abbreviations: NA, not applicable; WBC, white blood cell.
Significance testing for patient characteristics with more than binomial categories (eg, comorbidity score, race, race and ethnicity, and insurance status) was performed using the Pearson χ2 test. The proportion of each strata was compared between those with and without perforation. For example, the percentage of patients with Medicare among those with perforation was compared with the percentage of patients with Medicare among those without perforation. Differences in continuous variables (age and WBC count) were tested for significance using the t test.