Table 3. FIP criteria (as proposed by the European Commission) met by each of the products cited in the MPCC calls reported in previous tables.

Medical case#	Brand and/or product name	Form1	Odor	Color	Appearance	Packaging	Labeling	Volume	Size
A	Visior sweet almond extract		x	x			x
B	Bleach tablet				x
C	Visior hygiene plus			x
D	Champion henna and hazelnutsfor brunettes					x
E	Soupline lavender
F	Cottage Happy ShowerTequila Sunrise	x	x	x		x	x	x
G	Tropic force multi-purposehousehold cleaner fruity atmosphere		x				x
H	Le Comptoir de Famille tomato leaf liquid soap						x
I	Mir vaisselle			x
J	Cajoline Vaporesse					x
K	Milodor strawberry			x			x
L	O’Cedar stratified andlaminated flooring modern parquet			x		x
M	Adidas Sport Field menthol						x
N	Eau Précieuse					x	x
O	Skip Actigel				x
P	Cosmence				x
Q	Apta berry vinegar						x
R	Schwarzkopf Got2b	x		x
S	Dishwasher tablet				x
T	Soupline					x
Total		2	3	7	4	6	8	1	0

¹This table provides the coding of each product’s attributes, both listed in the FIP Directive [4] criteria and referred by a patient (or a caller) in explaining his/her accidental poisoning ingestion. Form, color, odor, volume and size are criteria easier to code than appearance and packaging, given the difference between product appearance and product packaging is not obvious (e.g., [139]). In this table, we have coded “appearance” as confusing attribute only for solid products (e.g., bleach tablet, dishwasher tablet, etc.) and “packaging” only for liquid products (e.g., shower gel, shampoo, etc.). Regarding to labeling, this criteria is fulfilled each time the product or brand name is confusing (e.g., Eau Précieuse (#N) given it means “precious water”).