Table 2.
Province, country | Study | Population (n) | Age | Antigena | Findingsb |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dodowa, Ghana | Dodoo et al. [239] | Children (118) | 3–15 years | Recombinant DBLα domain |
Plasma samples from most children recognised recombinant PfEMP1 No association between IgG to recombinant PfEMP1 and protection |
Kilifi, Kenya | Mackintosh et al. [289] | Children | <10 years | Recombinant A4 PfEMP1 domains |
Anti-DBLα antibodies in those who were parasite negative at baseline were associated with protection No association between antibodies to other domains and protection |
Sudan | Staalsoe et al. [252] | Children | – |
Synthetic peptides to conserved regions of PfEMP1 (same epitope as Dodoo et al. 2001) |
IgG levels higher in asymptomatic infection compared to febrile malaria |
Tanga, Tanzania | Magistrado et al. [290] | Children | 0–19 years | Recombinant DBLα, DBL2γ, CIDR2β (3D7) | In children (4–9 years), the presence of antibodies were associated with reduced numbers of malaria episodes |
Kilifi, Kenya | Chan et al. [102] | Children (296) | 1–10 years | Reference parasites (3D7, E8B) and genetically-modified parasites | PfEMP1 is a dominant target of antibodies and PfEMP1-specific antibodies were associated with protection against symptomatic malaria |
PubMed was searched for studies that examined the association between acquired human antibodies to recombinant PfEMP1 and protection against malaria, without an exclusion criterion, and attempts were made to include most studies
aAntibodies were measured by ELISA except for Chan et al. where antibodies were measured to native PfEMP1 by flow cytometry
bNot all findings are listed for all studies