Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 11.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;(4):CD001451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001451.pub3
Methods Randomisation by sealed envelopes.
Participants Nearly all women in that geographical area, including those with ‘high-risk’ pregnancies. Recruitment 1979-1981. 1628 women
Interventions Routine ultrasound examination at 18 weeks (biparietal diameter measured) and 32 weeks (biparietal diameter and mean abdominal diameter) with additional examination at 36 weeks’ gestation if fetus small-for-gestational age and/or presenting by breech - versus selective examination for clinical indications only
Outcomes Obstetric interventions (antepartum and intrapartum) for singleton pregnancies only. Perinatal outcome indices for all pregnancies (including multiple pregnancies)
Notes This trial was reported in letter form only in 1984. It subsequently became clear that there were inconsistencies in results, and the data were subsequently re-analysed. The data entered in this review are derived from more recent unpublished and published reports
Risk of bias
Item Authors’ judgement Description
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear Not stated.
Allocation concealment? Unclear Described as “sealed envelope”.
Blinding?
Women
No Not feasible.
Blinding?
Clinical staff
No Not feasible.
Blinding?
Outcome assessors
No Not feasible.
Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes
Yes The data could be re-included.
Free of selective reporting? Yes Selective outcome reporting bias not apparent.
Free of other bias? No More smokers in screened group; historical study.