Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014 Jun 13;20(9):957–964. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2014.06.004

Parkinsonian Syndrome in Familial Frontotemporal Dementia

Joanna Siuda 1,2, Shinsuke Fujioka 3, Zbigniew K Wszolek 3
PMCID: PMC4160731  NIHMSID: NIHMS611293  PMID: 24998994

Abstract

Parkinsonism in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) was first described in families with mutations in the microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) and progranulin (PRGN) genes. Since then, mutations in several other genes have been identified for FTD with Parkinsonism, including chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9ORF72), chromatin modifying protein 2B (CHMP2B), valosin-containing protein (VCP), fused in sarcoma (FUS) and transactive DNA-binding protein (TARDBP). The clinical presentation of patients with familial forms of FTD with Parkinsonism is highly variable. The Parkinsonism seen in FTD patients is usually characterized by akinetic-rigid syndrome and is mostly associated with the behavioral variant of FTD (bvFTD); however, some cases may present with classical Parkinson’s disease. In other cases, atypical Parkinsonism resembling progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) or corticobasal syndrome (CBS) has also been described. Although rare, Parkinsonism in FTD may coexist with motor neuron disease. Structural neuroimaging, which is crucial for the diagnosis of FTD, shows characteristic patterns of brain atrophy associated with specific mutations. Structural neuroimaging is not helpful in distinguishing among patients with parkinsonian features. Furthermore, dopaminergic imaging that shows nigrostriatal neurodegeneration in FTD with Parkinsonism cannot discriminate parkinsonian syndromes that arise from different mutations. Generally, Parkinsonism in FTD is levodopa unresponsive, but there have been cases where a temporary benefit has been reported, so dopaminergic treatment is worth trying, especially, when motor and non-motor manifestations can cause significant problems with daily functioning. In this review, we present an update on the clinical and genetic correlations of FTD with Parkinsonism.

Keywords: Parkinsonism, familial, frontotemporal dementia, genetics, autosomal dominant, mutation, phenotype

1. Introduction

In 1996, an international consensus conference was held in Ann Arbor, MI, USA to discuss the association of Parkinsonism with Frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and the term Frontotemporal Dementia and Parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 (FTDP-17) was introduced [1]. At that time, 13 families were described as having FTDP-17 with an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance. The clinical features of patients in these families were characterized as behavioral changes, dementia, Parkinsonism, amyotrophy, dystonia, and supranuclear gaze palsy.

FTD is clinically characterized by early behavioral changes and/or language impairment, which is followed by cognitive decline and dementia. Parkinsonism is usually present in the behavioral variant of FTD (bvFTD), but it is rarely seen in primary progressive aphasia (PPA), which is a language variant of FTD [2, 3, 4]. Parkinsonism in FTD may present before, during, or after the development of behavioral or language disturbances. The clinical manifestations of the Parkinsonism seen in FTD patients are varied. Parkinsonian syndrome in FTD ranges from an apparent classical presentation of Parkinson’s disease (PD) to atypical Parkinsonism that resembles progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and corticobasal syndrome (CBS) [2].

Up to 40% of FTD patients have a positive family history, which suggests a strong genetic component to these disorders. It is estimated that autosomal dominant cases account for over 13% of the total number of FTD cases [5, 6]. Currently, the best understood forms of autosomal dominant FTD associated with Parkinsonism are those linked to chromosome 17 and related to mutations in the microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) and progranulin (PGRN) genes [7, 8, 9]. Besides MAPT and PGRN, the chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9ORF72) gene, which was identified in 2011 is known to be the major causative gene for familial FTD that is also associated with Parkinsonism [3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11]. Mutations in four other genes: valosin-containing protein (VCP), chromatin modifying protein 2B (CHMP2B), transactive DNA-binding protein (TARDBP) and fused-in-sarcoma (FUS) are identified in a minority of FTD cases accompanied by the parkinsonian phenotype [12, 13, 14, 15]. In this review we describe the clinical features in familial FTD with Parkinsonism with known genetic defect.

2. Clinical genetics, general characteristic, and parkinsonian features in familial FTD with Parkinsonism

Molecular genetic studies in patients with FTD associated with Parkinsonism have identified mutations in several genes: MAPT, PGRN, C9ORF72, CHMP2B, and VCP. Mutations found in common ALS genes, TARDBP and FUS, may also contribute to FTD associated with Parkinsonism (Table 1). Parkinsonism seen in FTD patients carrying different autosomal dominant gene mutations can have a diverse clinical manifestation. In Table 2 we provide a summary of parkinsonian features and other motor and non-motor manifestations that could be present in patients with FTD.

Table 1.

The profile of genes associated with Parkinsonism in FTD

MAPT PGRN C9ORF72 CHMP2B TARDBP VCP FUS
Chromosomal localization 17q21.32 17q.21.31 9p21.2 3p11.2 1p36.22 9p13.3 16p11.2
Inheritance AD AD AD AD AD AD AD
Penetrance Almost 100% 90% by 70 years Probably high UKN UKN Incomplete UKN
Anticipation 0 + ++ UKN UKN UKN UKN
Estimated mutation frequency in FTD 0–50% 3–26% 14–48% <1% <1% <1% <1%
Mean AAO (range) 49 years (25–76) 59 years (48–83) 55 years (33–75) 58 years (46–65) 54 years (40–69) 55 years (46–79) 43 years (30–60)
Mean DD (range) 7 years (2–30) 7 years (1–14) 4.5 years (3–10) 10 years (5–21) 3 years (1–5) 6 years (5–8) 3 years (3–7)
Most frequent initial Dx. bvFTD ±P bvFTD ±P FTD/ALS ALS, FTD ALS, bvFTD IBMPFD FTD, ALS
Clinical Dx. during the disease course Most frequent Dx. FTD Parkinsonism FTD CBS FTD MND* FTD Dementia MND* FTD MND* FTD MND*
Relatively common Dx. Pyramidal signs PSP Parkinsonism Pyramidal signs Parkinsonism Parkinsonism FTD Parkinsonism Dementia Dementia
Rare Dx. CBS MND MND Hallucinations CBS MND* Epilepsy Dementia Language impairment Parkinsonism Parkinsonism
Prominent neuropathology Tau TDP-43 TDP-43, U U TDP-43 TDP-43 FUS

AAO=age at onset; AD=autosomal dominant; ALS=amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; bvFTD=behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia; DD=disease duration; Dx.=diagnosis; FTD=frontotemporal dementia; FUS=fused in sarcoma; IBMPFD= inclusion body myopathy and Paget’s disease of the bone and frontotemporal dementia; P=Parkinsonism; TDP-43=transactive DNA-binding protein; U=ubiquitin; UKN=unknown; 0=not present; (+)=present in some cases; (++)= frequent;

*

includes upper and lower motor neuron deficits.

Table 2.

Summary of characteristics of Parkinsonism and motor and non-motor manifestations other movement disorders seen in patients carrying autosomal dominant genes mutations for FTD associated with Parkinsonism

MAPT PGRN C9ORF72 CHMP2B TARDBP VCP FUS
Parkinsonism
 Bradykinesia +++ +++ ++ + ++ ++ ++
 Rigidity +++ +++ ++ ++ ++ + +
 Postural instability ++ ++ +
 Resting tremor +/− +/− +/− + +/−
 Gait impairment + + + +
PSP phenotype
 Supranuclear gaze palsy ++ + + + +
 Difficulty initiating saccades ++ + + + +
CBS phenotype
 Apraxia + ++ + ++ ++ +
 Cortical sensory loss + +
 Alien limb phenomenon + + +
Other movement disorders
 Tremor (except resting tremor) +/−
 Dyskinesia + +
 Dystonia + + + + +
 Myoclonus + + + +
 Chorea +/−
 Tics +
 RBD + +/−
 Restless legs syndrome
 Asymmetry ++ + +
Levodopa responsiveness
Might be temporarily effective Usually not effective Might be temporarily effective UKN Effective Might be effective UKN

CBS=corticobasal syndrome; PSP=progressive supranuclear palsy; RBD=REM behavioral sleep disorder; UKN=unknown; (−)=not present/not assessed; (+/−) =infrequent; (+)=present in some cases; (++)=moderate frequency; (+++)=very frequent

2.1 FTDP-17 (MAPT)

Mutations in the MAPT account for up to approximately 50% of FTD cases and the majority of FTDP-17 cases. Over 50 pathogenic MAPT mutations have been described (www.molgen.ua.ac.be/FTDMutations) [16]. The mode of inheritance is autosomal dominant. The mean age at onset is 49 years, but this can range from 25–76 years. The mean disease duration is approximately 7 years, but could be longer e.g. tau p.R406W mutation carriers can survive into the eighth decade of life [12, 17, 18, 19]. A positive family history is almost always present in MAPT mutation carriers, and their penetrance is nearly 100% [20]. No gender predilection has been identified [21]. The clinical presentation of FTDP-17 (MAPT) is variable, but cardinal signs include personality and behavioral changes, dementia, and Parkinsonism. At the onset of the disease, only one of these signs is typically exhibited, but in advanced disease stages all of the signs could be present. Based on the type of MAPT mutation, the initial FTDP-17 phenotype can be divided into frontotemporal dementia-predominant or Parkinsonism-predominant [22]. However, the most common clinical presentation of FTDP-17 (MAPT) is bvFTD. FTDP-17 (MAPT) patients experience slowly progressive dementia with gradual functional decline. Motor neuron deficits, such as amyotrophy and fasciculation are rarely seen [23, 24, 25].

2.1.1. Parkinsonism in FTDP-17 (MAPT)

Parkinsonism can be the first manifestation of FTDP-17 caused by mutations in MAPT (FTDP-17 (MAPT)), and it can initially have a good response to levodopa therapy. Because of this, some patients could be misdiagnosed as having PD at the early stage of the disease. When Parkinsonism is the first symptom of FTDP-17, it is usually caused by mutations in exon 10 of the MAPT gene (p.N279K, p.delN296, p.S305S, p.N296N, and p.G303V) [17, 25]. However in some FTDP-17 (MAPT) mutations, Parkinsonism occurs late in the disease course (p.P301S and p.N296H), or is rare and minimal (p.P301L, p.S305N, p.S352L, p.G272V, and p.R5L). Parkinsonism seen in FTDP-17 (MAPT) patients includes severe limb bradykinesia, axial and limb rigidity, and postural instability. These signs are often symmetric, and there is usually no resting tremor. Postural or action tremor may be observed, but this is rare. Atypical parkinsonian syndromes are also described in association with MAPT mutations; these are more likely associated with PSP syndrome than CBS. Parkinsonism accompanied by oculomotor abnormalities is usually present in p.delN296, p.S305S, and p.N279K mutations; these include slowed saccades, supranuclear gaze palsy resembling PSP syndrome. Rarely, CBS with eyelid apraxia may be present in MAPT mutations (p.P301S). Parkinsonism in FTDP-17 (MAPT) may also be accompanied by bulbar symptoms, including dysarthria and dysphagia, or corticospinal tract involvement, which may present as hyperreflexia, clonus, extensor plantar responses, and dystonia or myoclonus. Patients may occasionally respond to levodopa therapy at the initial stage of their illness; however, that is rarely sustained during the disease course [4, 21, 23, 26]. There is no clear association between cognitive decline and the presence, severity, or onset of Parkinsonism in FTDP-17 (MAPT) [20]. In most MAPT mutations, motor neuron disease is rarely present; however, p.K317M, p.N296N, and p.P301L mutations could be associated with amyotrophy, fasciculation, and denervation. The most common MAPT mutations associated with parkinsonian features and their clinical presentations are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3.

The MAPT mutations in FTDP-17 and their characteristic clinical phenotype.

Gene MAPT
Amino acid change N279K delN296 S305S N296N G303V P301S N296H K317M P301L S305N G272V
Mutation type Point Delision Silent Silent Point Point Point Point Point Point Point
Genomic region Exon 10 Exon 10 Exon 10 Exon 10 Exon 10 Exon 10 Exon 10 Exon 11 Exon 10 Exon 10 Exon 9
AAO (years) 41–50 31–40 >50 >50 31–40 ≤30 >50 41–50 41–50 31–40 41–50
DD (years) 6–10 ≤5 6–10 6–10 ≤5 6–10 ≤5 6–10 6–10 ≤5 6–10
Early Parkinsonism +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++
Late Parkinsonism +++ +++
Rare Parkinsonism + + +
Personality changes +++ +++ ++ +++ +++ +++
Dementia + +++ +++ + +++ + +++ +++ +++
Language difficulties + + + + + ++ + + + +
Supranuclear gaze palsy + + + + + + + + +
Apraxia + + + + +
Pyramidal signs + + + + + +
Amyotrophy + + +

AAO = age at onset; DD = disease duration; (−) = not present/not assessed; (+) = rare; (++) = present in some cases; (+++) = frequent

2.2 FTDP-17 (PGRN)

Mutations in the PGRN account for approximately 26% of FTD cases. More than 70 pathogenic PGRN mutations have been described so far (www.molgen.ua.ac.be/FTDMutations). The mode of inheritance is autosomal dominant. The mean age at onset is around 59 years, almost a decade later than that of FTDP-17 (MAPT) cases, but it can range from 48–83 years [3]. The disease duration is variable and ranges from 1–14 years and is usually shorter on average than that of MAPT mutation carriers. PGRN mutations show age-dependent penetrance. The penetrance reaches 90% at age 70 years [27, 28, 29, 30]. A wide spectrum of cognitive, behavioral, and motor features in FTDP-17 is associated with PGRN mutations, but the particular type of mutation does not predict the clinical syndrome [27, 28, 29, 31, 32]. PGRN mutations are usually associated with bvFTD, but unlike MAPT mutation carriers, an isolated language dysfunction and primary progressive aphasia syndrome (PPA) can be also observed [3]. A careful language evaluation may help to predict PGRN mutations in FTDP patients [21]. Measurement of serum progranulin levels, which are extremely low in PGRN mutation carriers, may help achieve a correct diagnosis in FTDP-17 independently of the phenotypic presentation when genetic testing is unavailable. It has been suggested that this approach could be used as a cost-effective prediction of PGRN mutations among FTDP-17 patients [33, 34].

2.2.1. Parkinsonism in FTDP-17 (PGRN)

Mild Parkinsonism characterized by akinetic-rigid syndrome occurs relatively frequently (40–60%) in patients with PGRN mutations, but this is usually late in the disease course and occurs after the development of FTD phenotype [9]. In minority of the cases carrying PGRN mutations (p.Leu271LeufsX10), Parkinsonism has been described as a predominant clinical manifestation [4]. Some FTDP-17 cases with PGRN mutations present both visual hallucinations and Parkinsonism, which is suggestive of Lewy body disease [21, 35]. Some cases may have atypical parkinsonian features characterized by progressive asymmetric rigidity and apraxia, which is reminiscent of CBS (p.V200GfsX18, p.A9D and p.E498DfsX12) [36]. Asymmetric apraxia that is consistent with parietal lobe dysfunction and is associated with parkinsonian signs that present early in the disease course may help distinguish PGRN mutation carriers from other FTD patients with parkinsonian syndromes. PGRN mutations are suggested to be one of the most common causes of familial CBS [37]. Parkinsonism seen in FTDP-17 (PGRN) cases may initially respond to levodopa; however, in most cases, it is not levodopa-sensitive [38, 39]. The specific PGRN mutations in which Parkinsonism are most likely to be observed are summarized in Table 4.

Table 4.

The PGRN mutations in FTDP-17 and their characteristic clinical phenotype.

Gene PGRN
Aminio acid change R493X T304LfsX58 C253X A9D T7A G401X E498DfsX12 L271LfsX10 V200GfsX18
Mutation type Point Insertion Deletion Point Point Point Deletion Deletion Point
Genomic region Exon 12 Exon 9 Exon 8 Exon 2 Exon 2 Exon 11 Exon 12 Exon 7 Intron 7
AAO (years) 44–62 57 60 46–59 50 55–69 NA 66 62
DD (years) 3–9 5 NA 4–7 NA NA NA 1–8 9
Parkinsonism ++ + + + + + + +++ +
Personality changes + + ++ + + ++ + ++ +
Dementia + + + + + + + + +
Language difficulties ++ + + + + +
Supranuclear gaze palsy ++
Apraxia + + ++ + + ++ ++ ++
Pyramidal signs +
Amyotrophy +

AAO = age at onset; DD = disease duration; NA = not present/not assessed; (−) = absent; (+) = rare; (++) = present in some cases; (+++) = frequent

2.3 C9ORF72 expansion

The C9ORF72 expansion accounts for up to approximately 48% of FTD cases. The C9ORF72 gene located on chromosome 9 encodes the chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 protein. Abnormal expansions of a noncoding GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat (700 – 1600 repeats) causes variable combination of clinilcal phenotypes. The C9ORF72 expansion length in specific brain regions from autopsy cases with FTD and ALS revealed an association with age at onset in the frontal cortex and disease duration in the cerebellum, but a similar association was not detected in blood [40]. It is not yet known whether the C9ORF72 expansion length contributes to the different phenotypes associated with the disease thus further studies are needed. The mode of inheritance is autosomal dominant. Anticipation was observed in some families. The age at onset and disease duration is highly variable. The mean age at onset is around 55 years (range 33–75 years). The mean disease duration is approximately 4.5 years, and typically ranges from 3–10 years [41, 42]. The clinical phenotype of C9ORF72 expansion carriers mainly consists of bvFTD, ALS, or FTD with motor neuron disease.

2.3.1. Parkinsonism in C9ORF72 expansion

Parkinsonism is reported in about one third of patients with C9ORF72 expansions [42, 43]. Parkinsonism in FTD due to C9ORF72 repeat expansions is usually characterized by a relatively symmetric akinetic-rigid syndrome and gait disturbances. Postural and action tremors can occasionally be observed, but resting tremors are typically not seen [41, 44]. Parkinsonism is usually associated with predominant bvFTD or FTD/ALS, but was not described in patients with pure ALS [45, 46]. Parkinsonism in C9ORF72 FTD patients may remain pure, without associated cognitive deficits or dementia for over 10 years, but this is rare [46, 47]. Cases that present with CBS or PSP syndromes have also been described [48]. Parkinsonian features in patients with C9ORF72 mutations typically evolve within the first years of the disease course, and can temporarily be levodopa responsive, but most patients do not benefit from anti-parkinsonian treatment [34, 49].

2.4 FTD-3 (CHMP2B)

In 2005, the CHMP2B gene, located on chromosome 3p11.2, was associated with FTD linked to chromosome 3 (FTD-3) in large kindred from Denmark and one unrelated Belgian familial FTLD patient [37]. The CHMP2B gene mutations are currently understood to be a rare genetic cause of familial FTD; only four pathogenic mutations have been described (www.molgen.ua.ac.be/FTDMutations). The mode of inheritance is autosomal dominant. Since the disease has a subtle onset and often slow progression, the exact age at onset can be difficult to determine. The mean age at onset has been reported to be around 58 years, and the mean disease duration is approximately 10 years with great variability [50]. CHMP2B mutation carriers typically present with bvFTD at an early stage of their disease, but patients can develop more global loss of cognition [51]. Infrequently, bvFTD can be accompanied by motor symptoms, including parkinsonian features, dystonia, pyramidal signs, and myoclonus; this is especially true in the later stages of the disease [52].

2.4.1. Parkinsonism in FTD-3 (CHMP2B)

bvFTD in FTD-3 can be accompanied by motor symptoms, which include parkinsonian features, dystonia, pyramidal signs and myoclonus, but this finding is infrequent or is found late in the disease course [52]. Classical Parkinsonism is seen in a minority of patients carrying CHMP2B mutations, and it is usually characterized by asymmetrical akinetic-rigid syndrome [51, 53]. Parkinsonism in FTD-3 typically occurs a few years after the symptomatic disease onset. Rarely, an atypical parkinsonian phenotype that is accompanied by supranuclear gaze palsy or apraxia could be observed in FTD-3. Responsiveness to levodopa therapy has not been reported.

2.5 VCP mutations

The VCP gene is located on chromosome 9p13.3 and encodes valosin-containing protein. In 2004, a mutation in VCP was found in a rare autosomal dominant multisystem degenerative disorder, inclusion body myopathy and Paget’s disease of the bone and frontotemporal dementia (IBMPFD) [54]. Over 15 potentially pathogenic mutations in VCP have been described to date. The phenotypic presentations within families with VCP mutations are highly variable; about 35% of patients present with personality and cognitive changes. VCP mutation phenotypes may also include motor neuron degeneration in the form of familial ALS [42]. Several affected individuals from families with IBMPFD and VCP mutations have been reported to manifest with Parkinsonism, especially in the late disease stages [55, 56, 57, 58, 59].

2.5.1. Parkinsonism in VCP mutations

Several affected individuals from families with IBMPFD and VCP mutations (p.R159C, p.R191Q, p.T262A, and p.P137L) have been reported to manifest with akinetic-rigid Parkinsonism that usually presents in the late disease stages [55, 56, 58, 59]. Single cases with an p.R159C mutation in the VCP have been reported with typical PD features including resting tremor, REM sleep behavioral disorder (RBD), and lasting levodopa responsiveness [54, 60, 61]. However, VCP is rarely associated with Parkinsonism [54].

2.6 TARDBP mutations

In 2008, the TARDBP gene mutation was identified as a causative gene for ALS. The TARDBP gene, located on chromosome 1p36.22, encodes a 43-kDa ubiquitously expressed nuclear DNA- and RNA-binding protein (TDP-43) [62]. To date, more than 30 TARDBP mutations have been reported, which explains approximately 4% of familial ALS cases and a smaller proportion of FTD cases [63]. The mode of inheritance is autosomal dominant. The most common clinical phenotype associated with TARDBP mutations is ALS. Several patients carrying TARDBP mutations have been reported to develop Parkinsonism [62, 63, 64].

2.6.1. Parkinsonism in TARDBP mutations

Several patients carrying TARDBP mutations have been reported to develop Parkinsonism in addition to the FTD phenotype [63, 64, 65]. An A382T mutation was described to be associated with a typical PD phenotype or FTD with levodopa-responsive Parkinsonism in the absence of cognitive or motoneuron disturbances [10]. Other mutation carriers presented with a combination of Parkinsonism and ALS and/or FTD. Parkinsonism due to TARDBP mutations is characterized as a mixed type with predominant akinetic-rigid syndrome and may be accompanied by dystonia or tics. RBD was also reported in TARDBP mutation carriers with parkinsonian features. Responsiveness to levodopa therapy is typically good.

2.7 FUS mutations

In 2009, mutations in the FUS gene were originally described in familial ALS. Mutations in the FUS account for up to 4% of familial ALS cases [66]. The FUS, located on chromosome 16p11.2., encodes fused in sarcoma protein [67, 68]. A number of specific mutations in FUS have been suggested to cause FTD and essential tremor [69, 70]. In a cohort of 476 familial ALS and 41 sporadic ALS cases, a family with the FUS p.R521C mutation was identified in the proband, who developed ALS with Parkinsonism and dementia.

2.7.1. Parkinsonism in FUS mutations

A single case of a patient with a p.M254V mutation that was associated with bvFTD and parkinsonian signs that developed further in the disease course has been reported [15]. The Parkinsonism in this case was characterized by rigidity; however, information about other motor and non-motor manifestations and responsiveness to levodopa was not provided. So far, very little is known about FTD with Parkinsonism due to FUS mutations.

Clinical characteristic of C9ORF72, CHMP2B, TARDBP, VCP and FUS genes mutations associated with Parkinsonism in FTD are summarized in Table 5.

Table 5.

Specific mutations associated with Parkinsonism in FTD and their characteristic clinical phenotype.

Gene C9ORF72 CHMP2B TARDBP VCP FUS
Amino acid change NA N143S* A382T K263E N267S A315E R159C R191Q T262A P137L R191G R159C M254V* R521C
Mutation type G4C2 hexanucleotide repeat expansion Point Point Point Point Point Point Point Point Point Point Point Point Point
Genomic region NA Exon 5 Exon 6 Exon 6 Exon 6 Exon 6 Exon 5 Exon 5 Exon 5 Exon 4 Exon 5 Exon 5 Exon 6 Exon 15
AAO (years) 58.0 71 53 35 69–74 57–63 53–62 37–63 51–56 38–50 42–45 50–73 52 NA
DD (years) 5.3 9 4 2 NA 4–6 1–5 1–7 4–15 10–21 9 5 NA NA
Parkinsonism ++ + +++ + + + + + + + ++ + + +
Personality changes +++ + + + ++ + + + + + +
Dementia + + + + + + + ++ + + +
Language difficulties + + + + ++ +
Supranuclear gaze palsy +
Apraxia + +
Pyramidal signs + + ++ +++ + +++ ++
Amyotrophy ++ + + +++ +++ ++ ++ +++ + +++

AAO = age at onset; DD = disease duration; NA = not present/not assessed; Sub = substitution; (−) = absent; (+) = rare; (++) = present in some cases; (+++) = frequent;

*

not proven to be pathogenic; only one mutations carrier has been identified for each mutation written in Italics.

3. Neuroimaging in FTD with Parkinsonism

Structural neuroimaging (MRI) is essential to the evaluation of patients with FTD, and characteristic patterns of brain atrophy are associated with specific genetic mutations (Table 6). FTDP-17 (MAPT) typically shows symmetrical fronto-temporal lobe atrophy, with the most severe abnormalities observed in the temporal lobes, whereas highly asymmetrical fronto-parieto-temporal atrophy is seen in FTDP-17 (PGRN) [71, 72, 73]. If symmetrical fronto-temporal atrophy is associated with midbrain atrophy, usually similar extrapyramidal features to those seen in PSP syndrome are observed. The presence of early parietal lobe atrophy in PGRN mutations may help to distinguish such cases from other patients with parkinsonian features in FTD. PGRN mutations are also associated with faster rates of whole brain atrophy compared to MAPT mutations [73]. It has been demonstrated that apart from fronto-temporal pathology, atrophy in the occipital lobes and cerebellum can help differentiate subjects with C9ORF72 mutations from those with MAPT or PGRN mutations or sporadic disease [10, 11, 34, 43]. Structural neuroimaging studies of patients with CHMP2B, TARDBP, VCP, and FUS mutations do not show specific patterns of brain atrophy, but atrophy that is usually spread throughout the frontal, temporal, and parietal lobes [12, 74, 75, 76].

Table 6.

Pattern of changes of neuroimaging in genetic forms of FTD associated with Parkinsonism (findings from structural and functional studies)

MAPT PGRN C9ORF72 CHMP2B* TARDBP* VCP* FUS*
Asymmetry +/− +++ +/− + + + +
Atrophy seen in structural neuroimaging studies (CT/MRI)
 Frontal lobe +++ ++ +++ + ++ + +
 Temporal lobe +++ ++ ++ + + +
 Parietal lobe + +++ + + + +
 Other regions Basal ganglia Occipital lobe, Thalamus Cerebellum Midbrain Caudate nucleus
Hypometabolism seen in 18FDG-PET
 Frontal lobe + ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ +
 Temporal lobe ++ ++ ++ + + ++ +
 Parietal lobe +/− +++ + ++ + +
 Other regions Putamen, striatum Caudate nucleus
Hypoperfusion seen in 99Tc-ECD-SPECT
 Frontal lobe ++ ++ ++ NA ++ ++ NA
 Temporal lobe ++ + ++ NA + ++ NA
 Parietal lobe + ++ + NA + NA
 Other regions Hippocampus, Cingulate cortex Caudate nucleus, Putamen Cerebellum

CT=computed tomography; MRI=magnetic resonance imaging; 18FDG-PET=18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography; 99Tc-ECD-SPECT=99Technet-ethylene cystine dimer single photon emission tomography;

*

Limited information; (−)= not present; (+/−)= infrequent; (+)= present in some cases; (++)= moderate frequency; (+++)= very frequent; NA=not assessed

Structural neuroimaging cannot help distinguish between FTD cases with and without parkinsonian features. Furthermore, in patients showing clear brain atrophy on MRI, little additional diagnostic benefit is gained by doing single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or positron emission tomography (PET) scans because hypoperfusion and hypometabolism are usually present in the same regions where MRI shows atrophy [77]. However, in patients with Parkinsonism in FTD, perfusion SPECT with 99Technet-ethylene cystine dimer (99Tc-ECD-SPECT) or 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET (FDG-PET) may confirm the extrapyramidal system dysfunction by showing reduced cerebral blood flow (99Tc-ECD-SPECT) and hypometabolism (FDG-PET) in the basal ganglia [78, 79, 80, 81].

Functional imaging with specific dopamine-related tracers (e.g. 99mTc-TRODAT-1, 123I-β-CIT, and 123I-FP-CIT for SPECT, and 18F-DOPA, 11C-DOPA, and 11C-raclopride for PET) may assist in confirming the nigrostriatal neurodegeneration seen in various parkinsonian syndromes including FTD with Parkinsonism and may be used to discriminate between neurodegenerative Parkinsonism and its mimics e.g. drug-induced Parkinsonism [78]. In FTD patients, where neuroleptics are widely used to assist with behavior disorders, it is important to differentiate between Parkinsonism with underlying neurodegenerative pathology and a drug-induced syndrome. The uptake of tracer is normal in drug-induced Parkinsonism, and an abnormal image supports the diagnosis of dopaminergic system neurodegeneration [82]. Unfortunately, neuroimaging of the dopaminergic system has cannot differentiate between PD and atypical Parkinsonism well [77]. Furthermore, dopaminergic imaging is not helpful in discrimination between different atypical parkinsonian syndromes, including FTD with Parkinsonism [83].

4. Pathologic findings in FTD with Parkinsonism

Neuropathologically, FTD is defined as Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (FTLD), a proteinopathy characterized by the presence of abnormal protein inclusions in the cytoplasm or nuclei of neuronal and glial cells. Parkinsonian features in FTD are most likely associated with tau pathology (FTLD-tau). MAPT mutation carriers with Parkinsonism in FTD exhibit a combination of tau-immunoreactive aggregates in neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendroglial cells that are localized in the cortex, basal ganglia, and the subcortical white matter [68]. However, more than 50% of FTLD patients present with tau-negative, TDP-43–positive ubiquitinated neuronal and glial cytoplasmic inclusions (FTLD-TDP). TDP-43–positive inclusions are the pathological hallmark in FTD with Parkinsonism caused by PGRN, C9ORF72, TARDBP, and VCP mutations. FUS mutation carriers have FUS-positive, and TDP-43-negative inclusions and are thus referred to as FTLD-FUS. In CHMP2B mutation carriers the inclusion protein remains unknown; they exhibit ubiquitin-positive but tau negative inclusions and TDP-43-negative and FUS-negative cytoplasmic inclusions, which are referred to as FTLD-ubiquitin proteasome system (FTLD-UPS), previously known as FTLD-ubiquitin (FTLD-U) [84].

5. Differential diagnosis of Parkinsonism in FTD

The main considerations in the differential diagnosis of Parkinsonism in FTD are other neurodegenerative diseases. Parkinsonism in FTD is present in addition to behavioral and personality changes and usually occurs a few years after the cardinal FTD symptoms are present.

The atypical Parkinsonism with oculomotor disturbances and severe postural instability that cause frequent falls and are characteristic for PSP can occur in the disease course of autosomal dominant genes mutations in FTD with Parkinsonism. The same is true for the asymmetrical parkinsonian syndrome with additional motor and non-motor manifestations such as myoclonus and dystonia followed by focal cortical deficits, which are characteristic for CBS. Conversely to sporadic disease, the PSP and CBS phenotypes associated with FTD with Parkinsonism usually develop after the behavioral and personality changes that are characteristic for bvFTD. MSA is mostly sporadic, progressive neurodegenerative disease, but it is unlike FTD with Parkinsonism where half of the patients report positive family history. Furthermore, the Parkinsonism found in MSA is associated with severe autonomic failure, cerebellar ataxia, and corticospinal disorders, which are not seen in FTD. The main differences between FTD with Parkinsonism and DLB are the rare visual hallucinations of FTD and the dominant dementia and fluctuations in cognitive status present in DLB. Finally, the clinical presentations that are the hallmark of typical PD are rarely seen in FTD patients with Parkinsonism. The presence of additional symptoms that are characteristic for bvFTD and the lack of levodopa response in most cases should help differentiate FTD with Parkinsonism from classical PD.

6. Management of Parkinsonism in FTD

Most patients with Parkinsonism in FTD respond poorly to levodopa (Tab.2). There are no data on the use of dopamine agonists in Parkinsonism in FTD. Furthermore, dopaminergic agents may trigger or exacerbate the psychiatric disturbances present in FTD such as agitation, delusions, paranoia, and hallucinations. Therefore, Parkinsonism in FTD should be treated if it creates significant problems with daily functioning. Using anti-parkinsonian agents requires empiric testing of tolerability and efficacy [84]. In the absence of pharmacological treatment, physical therapy can be helpful to preserve mobility, to reduce risk of falls, and to extend independence in activities of daily living [85].

7. Conclusion

In this review, we have summarized the current knowledge on the clinical and genetic correlations of FTD with Parkinsonism. It has become clear over the last two decades that there are multiple genetic autosomal dominant mutations leading to the development of FTD associated with Parkinsonism. The most common causative genes are MAPT, PGRN, and C9ORF72, but they are associated with a wide range of phenotypes. Substantial evidence supports the concept that FTD shares overlapping clinical features with other neurodegenerative disorders. Parkinsonism in FTD may present as classic PD (albeit rarely and usually early in the course of the illness); and if so it is characterized by an akinetic-rigid syndrome. In this rare situation it rather quickly evolves to the atypical Parkinsonism with lack of responsiveness to levodopa. In most cases Parkinsonism even from its onset is of atypical nature resembling phenotypes of PSP or CBS. Neuroimaging studies show characteristic patterns of brain atrophy for different gene mutations, but are not very helpful for the diagnosis of Parkinsonism in FTD. A precise diagnosis is made through a genetic testing. However, there are still a number of cases presenting with an FTD with parkinsonian phenotype, but without known genetic cause.

Highlights.

  • FTD with Parkinsonism is frequently caused by mutations in MAPT, PGRN, and C9ORF72 genes

  • Parkinsonism in FTD may initially present as classical PD

  • Some cases may benefit from levodopa but most do not

  • Symptoms vary and may resemble PSP and corticobasal syndrome.

  • MRI, PET, and SPECT cannot discriminate among syndromes arising from different mutations

Acknowledgments

Kelly E. Viola, ELS is thankfully acknowledged for language editing the manuscript. JS is supported by the Stowarzyszenie na Rzecz Rozwoju Neurologii Wieku Podeszlego grant. SF is supported by a gift from Carl Edward Bolch, Jr. and Susan Bass Bolch. ZKW is partially supported by NIH/NINDS P50 NS072187, and a gift from Carl Edward Bolch, Jr. and Susan Bass Bolch.

Footnotes

DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS

JS is supported by the Stowarzyszenie na Rzecz Rozwoju Neurologii Wieku Podeszlego grant.

SF is supported by a gift from Carl Edward Bolch, Jr. and Susan Bass Bolch.

ZKW is partially supported by NIH/NINDS P50 NS072187, and a gift from Carl Edward Bolch, Jr. and Susan Bass Bolch.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Foster NL, Wilhelmsen K, Sima AA, Jones MZ, D’Amato CJ, Gilman S. Conference Participants. Frontotemporal Dementia and Parkinsonism Linked to Chromosome 17: A Consensus Conference. Ann Neurol. 1997;41:706–715. doi: 10.1002/ana.410410606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pan XD, Chen XC. Clinic, neuropathology and molecular genetics of frontotemporal dementia: a mini-review. Translational Neurodegeneration. 2013;2:8. doi: 10.1186/2047-9158-2-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fujioka S, Wszolek ZK. Clinical aspects of familial forms of Frontotemporal dementia associated with Parkinsonism. J Mol Neurosci. 2011;45:359–365. doi: 10.1007/s12031-011-9568-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Puschmann A. Monogenic Parkinson’s disease and parkinsonism: Clinical phenotypes and frequencies of known mutations. Parkinsonism and Related Disorders. 2013;19:407–415. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2013.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rohrer JD, Guerreiro R, Vandrovcova J, Uphill J, Reiman D, Beck J, Isaacs AM, Authier A, Ferrari R, Fox NC, Mackenzie IR, Warren JD, de Silva R, Holton J, Revesz T, Hardy J, Mead S, Rossor MN. The heritability and genetics of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neurology. 2009;73:1451–1456. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181bf997a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Warren JD, Rohrer JD, Rossor MN. Frontotemporal dementia. BMJ. 2013;347:f4827. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f4827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hutton M, Lendon CL, Rizzu P, Baker M, Froelich S, Houlden H, et al. Association of missense and 50-splice site mutations in tau with theinherited dementia FTDP-17. Nature. 1998;393:702–5. doi: 10.1038/31508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Baker M, Mackenzie IR, Pickering-Brown SM, Gass J, Rademakres R, Lindholm C, Snowden J, Adamson J, Sadovnick AD, Rollinson S, Cannon A, Dwosh E, Neary D, Melquist S, Richardson A, Dickson D, Berger Z, Ericksen J, Robinson T, Zehr C, Dickey CA, Crook R, McGowan E, Mann D, Boeve B, Feldman H, Hutton M. Mutation in progranuline cause tau-negative frontotemporal dementia linked to chromosome 17. Nature. 2006;442(7105):916–919. doi: 10.1038/nature05016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kelley BJ, Haidar W, Boeve BF, Baker M, Graff-Radford NR, Krefft T, Frank AR, Jack CR, Jr, Shiung M, Knopman DS, Josephs KA, Parashos SA, Rademakers R, Hutton M, Pickering-Brown S, Adamson J, Kuntz KM, Dickson DW, Parisi JE, Smith GE, Ivnik RJ, Petersen RC. Prominent phenotypic variability associated with mutations in Progranulin. Neurobiology of Aging. 2009;30:739–751. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.08.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.DeJesus-Hernandez M, Mackenzie IR, Boeve BF, Boxer AL, Baker M, Rutherford NJ, Nicholson AM, Finch NA, Flynn Gilmer H, Adamson J, Kouri N, Wojtas A, Sengdy P, Hsiung G-YR, Karydas A, Seeley WW, Josephs AA, Coppola G, Geschwind DH, Wszolek ZK, Feldman H, Knopman D, Petersen R, Miller BL, Dickson D, Boylan K, Graff-Radford N, Rademakers R. Expanded GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat in noncoding region of C9ORF72 causes chromosome 9p-linked FTD and ALS. Neuron. 2011;72(2):1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Renton AE, Majounie E, Waite A, Simon-Sanchez J, Rollinson S, Gibbs JR, Schymick JC, Laaksovirta H, van Swieten JC, Myllykangas L, Kalimo H, Paetau A, Abramzon Y, Remes AM, kaganovich A, Scholz SW, Duckworth J, Ding J, Harmer DW, Hernandez DG, Johnson JO, Mok K, Ryten M, Trabzuni D, Guerreiro RJ, Orrell RW, Meal J, et al. A hexanucleotide repeat expansion in C9ORF72 is the cause of chromosome 9p21-linked ALS-FTD. Neuron. 2011;72(2):257–268. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rohrer JD, Warren JD. Phenotypic signatures of genetic frontotemporal dementia. Current Opinion in Neurology. 2011;24:542–549. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32834cd442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Goldman JS, Phil M, Rademakers R, Huey ED, Boxer AL, Mayeux R, Miller BL, Boeve BF. An algorithm for genetic testing of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neurology. 2011;76:475–483. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31820a0d13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Skibinski G, Parkinson NJ, Brown JM, Chakrabarti L, Lloyd SL, Hummerich H, Nielsen JE, Hodges JR, Spillantini MG, Thusgaard T, Brandner S, Brun A, Rossor MN, Gade A, Johannsen P, Sorensen SA, Gydesen S, Fisher EM, Collinge J. Mutations in the endosomal ESCRTIII-complex subunit CHMP2B in frontotemporal dementia. Nat Genet. 2005;37:806–808. doi: 10.1038/ng1609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Van Langenhove T, van der Zee J, Sleegers K, Engelborghs S, Vandenberghe R, Gijselinck I, Van den Broeck M, Mattheijssens M, Peeters K, De Deyn PP, Cruts M, Van Broeckhoven C. Genetic contribution of FUS to frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neurology. 2010;74:366–371. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181ccc732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Spillantini MG, Goedert M. Tau pathology and neurodegeneration. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:609–22. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70090-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Reed LA, Wszolek ZK, Hutton M. Phenotypic correlations in FTDP-17. Neurobiology of Aging. 2001;22:89–107. doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(00)00202-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ludolph AC, Kassubek J, Landwehrmeyea BG, Mandelkow E, Mandelkow EM, Burnc DJ, Caparros-Lefebvre D, Frey KA, de Yebenes JG, Gasser T, Heutin P, Hoglinger G, Jamrozik Z, Jellinger KA, Kazantsev A, Kretzschmar H, Lang AE, Litvan I, Lucas JJ, McGeer PL, Melquist S, Oertel W, Otto M, Paviour D, Reum T, Saint-Raymond A, Steele JC, Tolnay M, Tumani H, van Swieten JC, Vanier MT, Vonsattel JP, Wagner S, Wszolek ZK for the Reisensburg Working Group for Tauopathies With Parkinsonism. Tauopathies with parkinsonism: clinical spectrum, neuropathologic basis, biological markers, and treatment options. Eur J Neurol. 2009;16:297–309. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02513.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Carney RM, Kohli MA, Kunkle BW, Naj AC, Gilbert JR, Zuchner S, Pericak-Vance MA. Parkinsonism and distinct dementia patterns in a family with the MAPT R406W mutation. Alzheimer’s & Dementia. 2013:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.02.011. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Stamelou M, Quinn NP, Bathia KP. “Atypical” Atypical Parkinsonism: New Genetic Conditions Presenting With Features of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy, Corticobasal Degeneration, or Multiple System Atrophy—A Diagnostic Guide. Movement Disorders. 2013;28(9):1184–1199. doi: 10.1002/mds.25509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Boeve BF, Hutton M. Refining frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17: introducing FTDP-17 (MAPT) and FTDP-17 (PGRN) Arch Neurol. 2008;65:460–464. doi: 10.1001/archneur.65.4.460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Baba Y, Tsuboi Y, Baker MC, Uitti RJ, Hutton ML, Dickson DW, Farrer M, Putzke JD, Woodruff BK, Ghetti B, Murrell JR, Boeve BF, Petersen RC, Verpillat R, Brice A, Delisle MB, Rascolg O, Arima K, Dysken MW, Yasuda M, Kobayashi T, Sunohara N, Komure O, Kuno S, Sperfeld AD, Stoppe G, Kohlhase J, Pickering-Brown S, Neary D, Bugiani O, Wszolek ZK. The Effect of tau genotype on clinical features in FTDP-17. Parkinsonism and Related Disorders. 2005;11:205–208. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2005.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rademakers R, Cruts M, van Broeckhoven C. The role of tau (MAPT) in frontotemporal dementia and related tauopathies. Hum Mutat. 2004;24:277–295. doi: 10.1002/humu.20086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ogaki K, Li Y, Takanashi M, Ishikawa KI, Kobayashi T, Nonaka T, Hasegawa M, Kishi M, Yoshino H, Funayama M, Tsukamoto T, Shioya K, Yokochi M, Imai H, Sasaki R, Kokubo Y, Kuzuhara S, Motoi Y, Tomiyama H, Hattori N. Analyses of the MAPT, PGRN, and C9orf72 mutations in Japanese patients with FTLD, PSP, and CBS. Parkinsonism and Related Disorders. 2013;19:15–20. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2012.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wszolek ZK, Tsuboi Y, Ghetti B, Pickering-Brown S, Baba Y, Cheshire WP. Frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 (FTDP-17) Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. 2006;1:30. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-1-30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Soliveri P, Rossi G, Monza D, Tagliavini F, Piacentini S, Albanese A, Bugiani O, Girotti F. A case of dementia Parkinsonism resembling Progressive Supranuclear Palsy due to mutation in the tau protein gene. Arch Neurol. 2003;60:1454–1456. doi: 10.1001/archneur.60.10.1454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cruts M, Gijselinck I, van der Zee J, et al. Null mutations in progranulin cause ubiquitin-positive frontotemporal dementia linked to chromosome 17q21. Nature. 2006;442(7105):920–924. doi: 10.1038/nature05017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gass J, Cannon A, Mackenzie IR, Boeve B, Baker M, Adamson J, Crook R, Melquist S, Kuntz K, Petersen R, Josephs K, Pickering-Brown SM, Graff-Radford N, Uitti R, Dickson D, Wszolek Z, Gonzalez J, Beach TG, Bigio E, Johnson N, Weintraub S, Mesulam M, White CL, III, Woodruff B, Caselli R, Hsiung GY, Feldman H, Knopman D, Hutton M, Rademakers R. Mutations in progranulin are a major cause of ubiquitin-positive frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Human Molecular Genetics. 2006;15 (20):2988–3001. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Le Ber I, Camuza A, Hannequin D, Pasquier F, Guedj E, Rovelet-Lecrux A, Hahn-Barma V, van der Zee J, Clot F, Bakchine S, Puel M, Ghanim M, Lacomblez L, Mikol J, Deramecourt V, Lejeune P, de la Sayette V, Belliard S, Vercelletto M, Meyrignac C, Van Broeckhoven C, Lambert JC, Verpillat P, Campion D, Habert MO, Dubois B, Brice A the French research network on FTD/FTD-MND. Phenotype variability in progranulin mutation carriers: a clinical, neuropsychological, imaging and genetic study. Brain. 2008;131:732–746. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gijselinck I, Van Broeckhoven C, Cruts M. Granulin mutations associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration and related disorders: an update. Hum Mutat. 2008;29:1373–1386. doi: 10.1002/humu.20785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Benussi L, Ghidoni R, Pegoiani E, Moretti DV, Zanetti O, Binetti G. Progranulin Leu271LeufsX10 is one of the most common FTLD and CBS associated mutations worldwide. Neurobiology of Disease. 2009;30:379–385. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Moreno F, Indakoetxea B, Barandiaran M, Alzualde A, Gabilondo A, Estanga A, Ruiz J, Ruibal M, Bergareche A, Martí-Masso JF, Lopez de Munain A. “Frontotemporoparietal” dementia: clinical phenotype associated with the c”. 709-1G>A PGRN mutation. Neurology. 2009;73:1367–1374. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181bd82a7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Espay AJ, Litvan I. Parkinsonism and Frontotemporal Dementia: The Clinical Overlap. J Mol Neurosci. 2011;45(3):343–349. doi: 10.1007/s12031-011-9632-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schofield EC, Halliday GM, Kwok J, et al. Low serum progranulin predicts the presence of mutations: a prospective study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;22:981–984. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-101032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.McKeith IG, Dickson DW, Lowe J, Emre M, O’Brien JT, Feldman H, Cummings J, Duda JE, Lippa C, Perry EK, Aarsland D, Arai H, Ballard CG, Boeve B, Burn DJ, Costa D, Del Ser T, Dubois B, Galasko D, Gauthier S, Goetz CG, Gomez-Tortosa E, Halliday G, Hansen LA, Hardy J, Iwatsubo T, Kalaria RN, Kaufer D, Kenny RA, Korczyn A, Kosaka K, Lee VM, Lees A, Litvan I, Londos E, Lopez OL, Minoshima S, Mizuno Y, Molina JA, Mukaetova-Ladinska EB, Pasquier F, Perry RH, Schulz JB, Trojanowski JQ, Yamada M Consortium on DLB. Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: third report of the DLB Consortium. Neurology. 2005;65(12):1863–1872. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000187889.17253.b1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Boeve BF, Lang AE, Litvan I. Corticobasal degeneration and its relationship to progressive supranuclear palsy and frontotemporal dementia. Ann Neurol. 2003;54 (Suppl 5):S15–19. doi: 10.1002/ana.10570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Le Ber I, Camuza A, Hannequin D, Pasquier F, Guedj E, Rovelet-Lecrux A, Hahn-Barma V, van der Zee J, Clot F, Bakchine S, Puel M, Ghanim M, Lacomblez L, Mikol J, Deramecourt V, Lejeune P, de la Sayette V, Belliard S, Vercelletto M, Meyrignac C, Van Broeckhoven C, Lambert JC, Verpillat P, Campion D, Habert MO, Dubois B, Brice A the French research network on FTD/FTD-MND. Phenotype variability in progranulin mutation carriers: a clinical, neuropsychological, imaging and genetic study. Brain. 2008;131:732–746. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yu C-E, Bird TD, Bekris LM, et al. The spectrum of mutations in progranulin: a collaborative study screening 545 cases of neurodegeneration. Arch Neurol. 2010;67:161–170. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Di Fabio R, Tessa A, Simons EJ, et al. Familial frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism associated with the progranulin c.C1021T (p. Q341X) mutation. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2010;16:484–485. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2010.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.van Blitterswijk M, DeJesus-Hernandez M, Niemantsverdriet E, Murray ME, Heckman MG, Diehl NN, Brown PH, Baker MC, Finch NA, Bauer PO, Serrano G, Beach TG, Josephs KA, Knopman DS, Petersen RC, Boeve BF, Graff –Radford NR, Boylan KB, Petrucelli L, Dickson DW, Rademakers R. Association between repeat sizes and clinical and pathological characteristics in carriers of C9ORF72 repeat expansions (Xpansize-72): a cross-sectional cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:978–88. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70210-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Boeve BF, Boylan KB, Graff-Radford NR, DeJesus-Hernandez M, Knopman DS, Pedraza O, Vemuri P, Jones D, Lowe V, Murray ME, et al. Characterization of frontotemporal dementia and/or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis associated with the GGGGCC repeat expansion in C9ORF72. Brain. 2012;135:765–783. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Smith BN, Newhouse S, Shatunov A, Vance C, Topp S, Johnson L, Miller J, Lee Y, Troakes C, Scott KM, Jones A, Gray I, Wright J, Hortobagyi T, Al-Sarraj S, Rogelj B, Powell J, Lupton M, Lovestone S, Scapp PC, Weber M, Nestor PJ, Schelhaas HJ, Asbroek A, Silani V, Gellera C, Taroni F, Ticozzi N, van den Berg L, et al. The C9ORF72 expansion mutation is a common cause of ALS+/−FTD in Europe and has a single founder. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013;21:102–108. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Waldo ML, Gustafson L, Nilsson K, Traynor BJ, Renton AE, Englund E, Passant U. Frontotemporal dementia with a C9ORF72 expansion in a Swedish family: clinical and neuropathological characteristics. Am J Neurodegener Dis. 2013;2(4):276–286. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yeh TH, Lai SC, Weng YH, Kuo HC, Wu-Chou YH, Huang CL, Chen RS, Chang HC, Traynor B, Lu CS. Screening for C9orf72 repeat expansions in parkinsonian syndromes. Neurobiology of Aging. 2013;34:1311.e3–1311.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Friedland RP, Shah JJ, Farrer LA, Vardarajan B, Rebolledo-Mendez JD, Mok K, Hardy J. Behavioral variant frontotemporal lobar degeneration with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with a chromosome 9p21 hexanucleotide repeat. Frontiers in neurology. 2012;3:136. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2012.00136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Savica R, Adeli A, Vemuri P, Knopman DS, DeJesus-Hernandez M, Rademakers R, Fields J, Whitwell J, Jack CR, Lowe V, Petersen RC, Boeve BF. Characterization of a family with c9FTD/ALS associated with the GGGGCC repeat expansion in C9ORF72. Arch Neurol. 2012;69(9):1164–1169. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2012.772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.O’Dowd S, Curtin D, Waite AJ, Roberts K, Pender N, Reid V, O’Connell M, Williams NM, Morris HR, Traynor BJ, Lynch T. C9ORF72 expansion in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/ frontotemporal dementia also causes Parkinsonism. Mov Disord. 2012;27:1072–1074. doi: 10.1002/mds.25022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lindquist SG, Duno M, Batbayli M, Puschmann A, Braendgaard H, Mardosiene S, Svenstrup K, Pinborg LH, Vestergaard K, Hjermind LE, Stokholm J, Andersen BB, Johannsen P, Nielsen JE. Corticobasal and ataxia syndromes widen the spectrum of C9ORF72 hexanucleotide expansion disease. Clin Genet. 2013;83:279–283. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2012.01903.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Arvanitakis Z. Update on Frontotemporal Dementia. Neurologist. 2010;16(1):16–22. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0b013e3181b1d5c6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Holm IE, Isaacs AM, Mackenzie IR. Absence of FUS-immunoreactive pathology in frontotemporal dementia linked to chromosome 3 (FTD-3) caused by mutation in the CHMP2B gene. Acta Neuropathol. 2009;118:719–720. doi: 10.1007/s00401-009-0593-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Gydesen S, Brown JM, Brun A, Chakrabarti L, Gade A, Johannsen P, Rossor M, Thusgaard T, Grove A, Yancopoulou D, Spillantini MG, Fisher EMC, Collinge J, Sorensen SA. Chromosome 3 linked frontotemporal dementia (FTD-3) Neurology. 2002;59:1585–1594. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000034763.54161.1f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Stokholm J, Teasdale TW, Johannsen P, Nielsen JE, Nielsen TT, Isaacs A, Brown JM, Gade A the Frontotemporal dementia Research in Jutland Association (FReJA) consortium. Cognitive impairment in the preclinical stage of dementia in FTD-3 CHMP2B mutation carriers: a longitudinal prospective study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84:170–176. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-303813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ghanim M, Guillot-Noel L, Pasquier F, et al. CHMP2B mutations are rare in French families with frontotemporal lobar degeneration. J Neurol. 2010;257(12):2032–2036. doi: 10.1007/s00415-010-5655-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Watts GD, Wymer J, Kovach MJ, Mehta SG, Mumm S, Darvish D, Pestronk A, Whyte MP, Kimonis VE. Inclusion body myopathy associated with Paget disease of bone and frontotemporal dementia is caused by mutant valosin-containing protein. Nat Genet. 2004;36:377–381. doi: 10.1038/ng1332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Spina S, Van Laar AD, Murrell JR, Hamilton RL, Kofler JK, Epperson F, Farlow MR, Lopez OL, Quinlan J, DeKosky ST, Ghetti B. Phenotypic variability in three families with valosin-containing protein mutation. European Journal of Neurology. 2013;20:251–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03831.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.van der Zee J, Pirici D, Van Langenhove T, et al. Clinical heterogeneity in 3 unrelated families linked to VCP p.Arg159His. Neurology. 2009;73:626–632. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181b389d9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Spina S, Van Laar A, Murrell J, de Courten-Myers G, Hamilton RL, Farlow MR, et al. Frontotemporal dementia associated with a valosin-containing protein mutation: report of three families. FASEB J. 2008;22:58.4. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Mehta SG, Khare M, Ramani R, Watts GDJ, Simon M, Osann KE, Donkervoort S, Dec E, Nalbandian A, Platt J, Pasquali M, Wang A, Mozaffar T, Smith CD, Kimonis VE. Genotype–phenotype studies of VCP-associated inclusion body myopathy with Paget disease of bone and/or frontotemporal dementia. Clin Genet. 2013;83:422–431. doi: 10.1111/cge.12000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.González-Pérez P, Cirulli ET, Drory VE, Dabby R, Nisipeanu P, Carasso RL, Sadeh M, Fox A, Festoff BW, Sapp PC, McKenna-Yasek D, Goldstein DB, Brown RH, Blumen SC. Novel mutation in VCP gene causes atypical amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology. 2012;79:2201–2208. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318275963b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Spina S, Van Laar AD, Murrell JL, Hamilton RL, Kofler JK, Epperson F, Farlow MR, Lopez OL, Quinlane J, DeKosky ST, Ghetti B. Phenotypic variability in three families with valosin-containing protein mutation. Eur J Neurol. 2013;20:251–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03831.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Chan N, Le C, Shieh P, Mozaffar T, Khare M, Bronstein J, Kimonis V. Valosin-containing protein mutation and Parkinson’s disease. Letter to the Editor Parkinsonism and Related Disorders. 2012;18:107–109. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2011.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Rayaprolu S, Fujioka S, Traynor S, Soto-Ortolaza AI, Petrucelli L, Dickson DW, et al. TARDBP mutations in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2013;19:312–315. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2012.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Mosca L, Lunetta C, Tarlarini C, Avemaria F, Maestri E, Melazzini M, Corbo M, Penco S. Wide phenotypic spectrum of the TARDBP gene: homozygosity of A382T mutation in a patient presenting with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, and frontotemporal lobar degeneration, and in neurologically healthy subject. Neurobiology of Aging. 2012;33:1846.e1–1846.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.01.108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Quadri M, Cossu G, Saddi V, Simons EJ, Murgia D, Melis M, et al. Broadening the phenotype of TARDBP mutations: the TARDBP Ala382Thr mutation and Parkinson’s disease in Sardinia. Neurogenetics. 2011;12:203–9. doi: 10.1007/s10048-011-0288-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Rayaprolu S, Fujioka S, Traynor S, Soto-Ortolaza AI, Petrucelli L, Dickson DW, et al. TARDBP mutations in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2013;19:312–315. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2012.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kwiatkowski TJ, Jr, Bosco DA, LeClerc AL, Tamrazian E, Vanderburg CR, Russ C, Davis A, Gilchrist J, Kasarskis EJ, Munsat T, Valdmanis P, Rouleau GA, Hosler A, Cortelli P, de Jong PJ, Yoshinaga Y, Haines JL, Pericak-Vance MA, Yan J, Ticozzi N, Siddique T, McKenna-Yasek D, Sapp PC, Horvitz HR, Landers JE, Brown RH., Jr Mutations in the FUS/TLS Gene on Chromosome 16 Cause Familial Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Science. 2009;323(5918):1205–1208. doi: 10.1126/science.1166066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Van Langenhove T, van der Zee J, Van Broeckhoven C. The molecular basis of the frontotemporal lobar degeneration–amyotrophic lateral sclerosis spectrum. Annals of Medicine. 2012;44:817–828. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2012.665471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Sieben A, Van Langenhove T, Engelborghs S, Martin JJ, Boon P, Cras P, De Deyn PP, Santens P, Van Broeckhoven C, Cruts M. The genetics and neuropathology of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Acta Neuropathol. 2012;124:353–372. doi: 10.1007/s00401-012-1029-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Gao K, Zheng W, Deng X, Xiong W, Song Z, Yang Y, Deng H. Genetic analysis of the fused in sarcoma gene in Chinese Han patients with Parkinson’s disease. Short communication. Parkinsonism and Related Disorders. 2014;20:119–121. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2013.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Labbe C, Rayaprolu S, Soto-Ortolaza A, Ogaki K, Uitti RJ, Wszolek ZK, Ross OA. Investigating FUS variation in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism and Related Disorders. 2014;20S1:S147–S149. doi: 10.1016/S1353-8020(13)70035-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Rohrer JD, Ridgway GR, Modat M, et al. Distinct profiles of brain atrophy in frontotemporal lobar degeneration caused by progranulin and tau mutations. Neuroimage. 2010;53:1070–1076. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Rohrer JD. Structural brain imaging in frontotemporal dementia. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2012;1822:325–332. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2011.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Whitwell JL, Josephs KA. Recent Advances in the Imaging of Frontotemporal Dementia. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2012;12(6):715–723. doi: 10.1007/s11910-012-0317-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Chio A, Calvo A, Moglia C, Restagno G, Ossola I, Brunetti M, Montuschi A, Cistaro A, Ticca A, Traynor BJ, Schymick JC, Mutani R, Marrosu MG, Murru MR, Borghero G. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-frontotemporal lobar dementia in 3 families with p. Ala382Thr TARDBP mutations. Arch Neurol. 2010;67:1002–1009. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kim EJ, Park YE, Kim DS, et al. Inclusion body myopathy with Paget disease of bone and frontotemporal dementia linked to VCP p. Arg155Cys in a Korean family. Arch Neurol. 2011;68:787–796. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Kalbe E, et al. Early signs of VCP-related frontotemporal dementia: a neuropsychological, FDG-PET and fMRI study. J Neurol. 2011;258:515–518. doi: 10.1007/s00415-010-5774-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Josephs KA, Whitwell JL, Parisi JE, et al. Caudate atrophy on MRI is a characteristic feature of FTLD-FUS. Eur J Neurol. 2010;17:969–975. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.02975.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Cummings JL, Henchcliffe C, Schaier S, Simuni T, Waxman A, Kemp P. The role of dopaminergic imaging in patients with symptoms of dopaminergic system neurodegeneration. Brain. 2011;134:3146–3166. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Pala PK, Wszolek ZK, Kishore A, de la Fuente-Fernandez R, Sossi V, Uitti RJ, Dobko T, Stoessl AJ. Positron emission tomography in pallido-ponto-nigral degeneration (PPND) family (frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 and point mutation in tau gene) Parkinsonism and Related Disorders. 2001;7:81–88. doi: 10.1016/s1353-8020(00)00026-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Kono S, Ouchi Y, Terada T, Suzuki M, Yagi S, Miyajima H. Combined FDG and raclopride PET study in a case of ALS with the R521C FUS gene mutation. J Neurol. 2012;259:367–369. doi: 10.1007/s00415-011-6168-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Tateishi T, Hokonohara T, Yamasaki R, Miura S, Kikuchi H, Iwaki A, Tashiro H, Furuya H, Nagara Y, Ohyagi Y, Nukina N, Iwaki T, Fukumaki Y, Kira J. Multiple system degeneration with basophilic inclusions in Japanese ALS patients with FUS mutation. Acta Neuropathol. 2010;119:355–364. doi: 10.1007/s00401-009-0621-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Diaz-Corrales FJ, Sanz-Viedma S, Garcia-Solis D, Escobar-Delgado T, Mir P. Clinical features and 123I-FP-SPECT imaging in drug-induced Parkinsonism and Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:556–64. doi: 10.1007/s00259-009-1289-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Pirker W, Djamshidian S, Asenbaum S, Gerschlager W, Tribl G, Hoffman M, et al. Progression of dopaminergic degeneration in Parkinson’s disease and atypical parkinsonism: a longitudinal beta-CIT SPECT study. Mov Disord. 2002;17:45–53. doi: 10.1002/mds.1265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Seltman RE, Matthews BR. Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration. Epidemiology, pathology, diagnosis and management. CNS Drugs. 2012;26(10):841–870. doi: 10.2165/11640070-000000000-00000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Jicha GA. Medical Management of Frontotemporal Dementias: The Importance of the Caregiver in Symptom Assessment and Guidance of Treatment Strategies. J Mol Neurosci. 2011 Nov;45(3):713–723. doi: 10.1007/s12031-011-9558-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES