Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 10;34(37):12379–12393. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1020-13.2014

Table 2.

Overview of experimental cohorts used to study the P2–P11 period and the effect of mPFC lesions

Experimental cohort Treatment Time Animals Males Females Litter Mice per litter Females/total
Naive controls 26 15 11 5 5.2 0.42
Sucrose preference (Fig. 2) VEH P2–P11 23 14 9 5 4.6 0.39
FLX P2–P11 22 12 10 5 4.4 0.45
FST (Fig. 2) VEH P2–P11 15 (23) 9 (14) 6 (9) 5 3.0 (4.6) 0.39
FLX P2–P11 10 (22) 5 (12) 5 (10) 5 2.0 (4.4) 0.45
Dendritic morphology (Fig. 3, Table 1) VEH P2–P11 3 (15) 3 (7) 0 (8) 3 1.0 (5.0) 0.53
FLX P2–P11 3 (14) 3 (7) 0 (7) 3 1.0 (4.7) 0.50
Electrophysiology (Figs. 4, 5, Table 2) VEH P2–P11 10 (27) 10 (14) 0 (13) 5 2.0 (5.4) 0.48
FLX P2–P11 10 (25) 10 (12) 0 (13) 5 2.0 (5.0) 0.52
Fear conditioning (Fig. 6) VEH P2–P11 24 (34) 14 10 (20) 7 3.4 (4.9) 0.59
FLX P2–P11 25 (32) 17 8 (15) 6 4.2 (5.3) 0.47
IL lesion (Fig. 7) Sham Adulthood 27 20 7
Ibotenic acid Adulthood 24 16 8
PL lesion (Fig. 8) Sham Adulthood 21 21 0
Ibotenic acid Adulthood 23 23 0

Numbers in parentheses refer to animals generated and are shown if only a subset of these animals were used in experiments.