Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 11.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Apr 8;39(5):1344–1364. doi: 10.1037/a0032379

Table 4.

Fit Indices for Structural Models of the Memory-Decision Making Relationships.

Decision-making task Model χ2 d.f. (χ2/df) SRMR AIC CFI APGI RMSEA WM→dmc EM→dmc SM→dmc
Resistance to Framing
(N = 510)
Full path 41.65 21 1.98 .033 .176 .982 .981 .044 .306** (.11) −.003 (.08) .006 (.08)
WM 41.65 23 1.81 .033 .168 .984 .984 .040 .309*** (.05) - -
No path 72.48 24 3.02 .070 .225 .958 .961 .063 - - -
Applying Decision Rules
(N = 506)
Full path 53.75 21 2.56 .038 .201 .973 .970 .055 .448*** (.10) −.065 (.08) .197* (.08)
WM 60.42 23 2.63 .040 .207 .969 .970 .055 .544*** (.04) - -
WM, SM 54.46 22 2.47 .038 .199 .973 .971 .054 .388*** (.07) - .196** (.07)
SM 77.85 23 3.38 .049 .241 .955 .952 .070 - - .462*** (.04)
No path 160.96 24 6.71 .117 .402 .888 .902 .102 - - -
Under/Overconfidence
(N = 510)
Full path 45.67 21 2.17 .035 .184 .979 .977 .049 .225* (.10) .049 (.07) .014 (.08)
WM 46.13 23 2.00 .035 .177 .980 .980 .045 .281*** (.05) - -
No path 71.23 24 2.97 .068 .222 .959 .962 .062 - - -
Recognizing Social Norms
(N = 503)
Full path 32.71 21 1.56 .029 .161 .989 .989 .033 −.080 (.11) .138^ (.08) .128 (.08)
EM 35.51 23 1.54 .032 .158 .989 .990 .032 - .152** (.05) -
No path 45.68 24 1.90 .050 .175 .980 .983 .042 - - -
Resistance to Sunk Costs
(N = 510)
Full path 40.42 21 1.92 .032 .174 .983 .982 .042 −.222* (.11) −.018 (.07) .358*** (.08)
SM 48.61 23 2.11 .039 .182 .978 .978 .047 - - .195*** (.05)
WM 62.05 23 2.70 .044 .208 .966 .967 .058 .058 (.06) - -
WM, SM 40.48 22 1.84 .032 .170 .984 .984 .040 −.238** (.09) - .359*** (.08)
No path 63.02 24 2.63 .048 .206 .966 .969 .056 - - -
Consistency in Risk
Perception
(N = 510)
Full path 44.13 21 2.10 .034 .181 .980 .978 .048 −.074 (.11) −.086 (.07) .296*** (.08)
SM 48.57 23 2.11 .038 .182 .978 .978 .047 - - .191*** (.05)
No path 62.33 24 2.60 .048 .205 .966 .970 .056 - - -

Note. WM (working memory), EM (episodic memory), SM (semantic memory), dmc (Decision-Making Competence variable, as indicated in the first column). Estimated coefficients for memory→decision making relationship (in the last three columns) are followed by respective standard errors (in parentheses). Significance levels of two-tailed tests are as follows:

^

p < .10,

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001. The endorsed model for each A-DMC task is indicated in bold.