Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 11;9(9):e107327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107327

Figure 2. MOLLI results in the calf muscle (n = 6): A) T1 errors obtained at 30°, 60° and 90° readout flip angle for conventional MOLLI fitting (Eq.1) and MOLLI fitting with inversion correction (Eq.2); B) Relative fitting residuals for the three parameter fit used in Eqs.1 and 2.

Figure 2

Note the increasing residuals with the three parameter fitting (used by Eqs.1 and 2) at higher flip angles; C) Measured signal and curves fit with the 3-parameter MOLLI fit in the calf muscle of one volunteer at 30°, 60° and 90°. Notice the increasing discrepancy between the fit and measured data at higher flip angle, confirmed by the increase in fitting residual in (B).