Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 15;7(8):2100–2110.

Table 1.

Characteristics of studies that analyzed red meat or processed meat consumption and bladder cancer

Author and year Study location Casesa/Subjiects Exposure Variable (Definition) Casesb Analytical comparison (high vs. low intake) Adjustments
Cohort studies
Jakszyn 2011 [6] Europe 1,001/481,419 Red meat (fresh and processed meat) 355 Quarter of intake Q4 vs. Q1 Total energy intake, smoking, educational level and BMI
Ferrucci 2010 [7] USA 854/300,933 Red meat (bacon, beef, cold cuts, liver, ham, hot dogs, pork, sausage, and steak) 226 Quintiles of intake Q5 vs. Q1 Age, sex, smoking, vegetables beverages fruit and total energy
Processed meat (bacon, ham, hotdogs sausage and luncheon meats) 200 Q5 vs. Q1
Larsson 2009 [18] Sweden 485/82,002 Red meat (beef, pork, meatballs hamburger, veal and kidney or liver) 164 ≥ 5 servings/week vs 0-3 servings/month Age, sex, smoking, education and total energy intake
Processed meat (ham, sausage and salami or cold cuts) 215 ≥ 5 servings/week vs. 0-3 servings/month
Beef, pork, or veal 21 ≥ 5 servings/week vs. 0-3 servings/month
Hamburger 39 ≥ 5 servings/week vs. 0-3 servings/month
Sausage (fried, grilled, or boiled) 41 ≥ 5 servings/week vs. 0-3 servings/month
Cross 2007 [19] USA 1,666/494,036 Red meat (beef, pork and lamb; bacon, beef, cold cuts, ham, hamburger, hot dogs, liver, pork, sausage, and steak) Age, sex, smoking, education, marital status, family history of cancer, race, BMI, frequency of vigorous physical activity, total energy intake, and fruit and vegetable consumption
Processed meat (bacon, red and poultry meat sausage, luncheon meats, cold cuts, ham, regular hot dogs)
Michaud 2006 [20] USA 808/135,893 Beef, pork, or lamb 72 ≥ 5 servings/week vs. 0 Age, smoking, caloric, geographic region and total fluid intake
Processed meat (bacon; hamburger) 39 ≥ 5 servings/week vs. 0
Hamburger 242 2-4 servings/week vs. 0
Nagano 2000 [21] Japan 114/38,540 Ham/sausage 26 2+/week vs. 0/week Age, gender, smoking, radiation exposure, educational, BMI and calendar time
Case-control studies
Lin 2012 [9] USA 884/1,762 Red meat (beef, veal, lamb, pork, game) 319 Quartiles of intake Q4 vs. Q1 Age, sex, smoking, BMI, energy intake, ethnicity, total vegetable intake, total fruit intake
Processed meat (hot dogs or sausage) 268 Q4 vs. Q1
Aune 2009 [4] Uruguay 254/5,571 Red meat (beef and lamb) 47 Tertile of intake T3 vs. T1 Age, sex, smoking, BMI, energy residence, education, milk, fish, income, fruits, interviewer, alcohol, grains, fatty foods, poultry and vegetables
Beef 39 T3 vs. T1
Lamb 18 T3 vs. T1
Processed meat 77 T3 vs. T1
Hu 2008 [5] Canada 1,029/6,068 Red meat (beef, pork, or lamb as a main or mixed dish and hamburger) NR Quartiles of intake Q4 vs. Q1 Age, sex, smoking, BMI, energy intake, province, education, alcohol, total of vegetable and fruit intake
Processed meat (bacon, smoked meat, hotdogs, corned beef and sausage) NR Q4 vs. Q1
García 2007 [22] Spain 912/1,785 Red meat (beef, veal, pork and lamb) 324 Quintiles of intake Q5 vs. Q1 Age, gender, smoking, region and quintiles of fruit and vegetable intake
Processed red meat 368 Q5 vs. Q1
Baena 2006 [23] Spain 74/163 Pork 68 ≥ 3 servings/week vs. 0-3 servings/month Age, smoking and fluid intake
Radosavljević 2005 [24] Serbia 130/260 Pork 48 Tertile of intake T3 vs. T1 Multivariable analysis
Balbi 2001 [25] Uruguay 124/744 Red meat (beef and lamb) NR Tertile of intake T3 vs. T1 Age, sex, smoking, BMI, total calories, education, residence, urban/rural status and ‘mate’ drinking
Salted meat NR T3 vs. T1
Barbecue NR T3 vs. T1
Tavani 2000 [26] Italy 431/8,451 Red meat (beef, veal and pork) 127 ≥ 6 portions/week vs. 0-3 portions/week Age, sex, smoking, education, residence, alcohol, milk, fruits and vegetables
Riboli 1991 [27] Spain 432/1,221 Red meat (beef, pork and lamb) NR Quarter of intake Q4 vs. Q1 Smoking and energy intake
Preserved meat NR Q4 vs. Q1

BMI: body mass index; NR: not reported.

a

Number of bladder cancer in study.

b

Number of cases in highest intake category.