Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 14;20(34):12260–12268. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i34.12260

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the study population (n = 127)

No biliary candidiasis (n = 89) Biliary candidiasis (n = 38) P value
Age (mean ± SD), yr 58.3 ± 15.6 64.7 ± 15.0 < 0.05
Male/female 52/37 20/18 NS
Primary diagnosis NS
Suspected carcinoma of the biliary tract 16 (18.0) 10 (26.3)
Stenosing papillitis 11 (12.4) 3 (7.9)
Carcinoma 9 (10.1) 6 (15.8)
PSC 9 (10.1) 5 (13.2)
CBD stenosis of unknown origin 13 (14.6) 5 (13.2)
Choledocholithiasis 9 (10.1) 3 (7.9)
Cholestatic hepatitis 4 (4.5) 1 (2.6)
Pancreatitis 4 (4.5) -
Other 14 (15.7) 5 (13.2)
Indication for ERCP NS
CBD stenosis 18 (20.2) 10 (26.3)
Suspected carcinoma 15 (16.9) 8 (21.1)
Carcinoma 9 (10.1) 6 (15.8)
Cholestasis 9 (10.1) 3 (7.9)
Choledocholithiasis 8 (9.0) 1 (2.6)
Cholangitis 7 (7.9) 2 (5.3)
PSC 6 (6.7) 5 (13.2)
Papillitis stenosans 4 (4.5) -
Pancreatitis 2 (2.2) -
Cholestatic hepatitis 1 (1.1) 1 (2.6)
Other 10 (11.2) 2 (5.3)

ERCP: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; CBD: Common bile duct; NS: Not significant; PSC: Primary sclerosing cholangitis; Other: Ischemic type biliary lesions, stenosis of the biliary anastomosis after liver transplantation, biliary cast syndrome, retroperitoneal fibrosis, iatrogenic injury of the bile duct, suspected primary or secondary sclerosing cholangitis.