Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 26;15(1):718. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-718

Table 3.

Negative log likelihoods for different CodeML models and P values of LRT tests comparing various models

-Ln(likelihood) P
NsitesM0 NsitesM1 NsitesM2 NsitesM7 NsitesM8 CmC M2a_Rel MAalt MAnull M1a-vs-M2a M7-vsM8 CmC-vs-M2a_rel MAalt-vs-M1a MAalt-vs-MAnull
All OBPs 43061.9 42980.1 42980.1 42629.2 42628.0 42600.1 42724.8 1 0.201 < 0.001
All CSPs 26669.8 26491.3 26491.2 26174.2 26171.9 26200.1 26257.7 1 0.086 < 0.001
PG2 OBPs 17839.3 17663.0 17658.7 17579.6 17576.2 42772.8 42772.8 0.02 0.04 < 0.001 1
PG1 OBPs 4397.4 4355.7 4355.7 4353.8 4351.6 42918.3 42918.3 1 0.09 < 0.001 1
59a OBPs 4406.6 4357.1 4357.1 4337.3 4337.3 42975.9 42975.9 1 1 0.059 1
SCG OPBs 15337.6 15319.7 15319.7 15147.7 15147.7 42955.1 42955.1 1 1 < 0.001 1
AEG CSPs 13000.5 12759.8 12754.0 12651.3 12645.5 26295.9 26295.9 0.009 0.009 < 0.001 1
SCG CSPs 13710.2 13597.0 13597.0 13436.5 13434.4 26437.5 26437.5 1 0.1 < 0.001 1

PG1: paralog group 1, PG2: paralog group 2, 59a: Obp59a group, SCG: single-copy orthology group, AEG: ant expansions group.