Table 3.
Variables that may have directly controlled bird predation in 2011
Variable | df | t statistics | p | r 2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Phylogenetic isolation of host plant | 18 | −0.20 | −0.83 | 2 × 10−3 |
Ectophagous Lepidoptera density | 18 | 0.82 | 0.41 | 0.03 |
Insect herbivory | 18 | −0.11 | 0.91 | 0.02 |
Budburst phenology | 18 | −1.02 | 0.31 | 0.05 |
Diversity of the surrounding canopy | 18 | −0.30 | 0.76 | 5 × 10−3 |
Distance to the closest conspecific host tree | 18 | 0.24 | 0.81 | 3 × 10−3 |
Species richness of the surrounding canopy | 18 | −0.67 | 0.50 | 0.02 |
Simple linear regression analyses testing the effects of phylogenetic isolation, insect herbivore density, diversity of the surrounding canopy, distance to the closest oak, insect herbivory, and budburst phenology on bird predation of ectophagous Lepidoptera in 2011