Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 4;32(27):2967–2974. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.5334

Table 3.

Frailty Model Sensitivity Analyses

Factor and Outlier Status Hazard Ratio 95% CI
Margin-negative patients
    High outlier 1.05 0.95 to 1.17
    Nonoutlier 1.00
    Low outlier 0.71 0.58 to 0.86
    Low v high outlier (ref) 0.67 0.54 to 0.83
Neoadjuvant XRT*
    High outlier 1.23 0.94 to 1.61
    Nonoutlier 1.00
    Low outlier 0.67 0.39 to 1.14
    Low v high outlier (ref) 0.55 0.32 to 0.94
≥ 12 lymph nodes pathologically evaluated*
    High outlier 1.13 0.99 to 1.28
    Nonoutlier 1.00
    Low outlier 0.73 0.58 to 0.91
    Low v high outlier (ref) 0.64 0.50 to 0.83
Excluding hospitals with no margin-positive patients*
    High outlier 1.12 1.02 to 1.23
    Nonoutlier 1.00
    Low outlier 0.59 0.47 to 0.74
    Low v high outlier (ref) 0.52 0.41 to 0.67
Alternate RAMP stratification
    High outlier 1.14 1.04 to 1.25
    At-risk high outlier 1.02 0.93 to 1.12
    Nonoutlier 1.00
    Low nonoutlier 0.78 0.65 to 0.94
    Low outlier 0.68 0.57 to 0.82

Abbreviations: RAMP, risk-adjusted margin positivity rate; ref, reference; XRT, radiotherapy.

*

Models were restricted to patients who received neoadjuvant XRT, who had ≥ 12 lymph nodes evaluated pathologically, and who were treated at hospitals reporting no observed margin-positive patients.

Alternate stratification as follows: high outlier: observed-to-expected ratio (O/E) > 1 and P < .05; at-risk high outlier: O/E > 1 and P > .05 but < .1; low nonoutlier: O/E < 1 and P > .05 but < .1; and low outlier: O/E < 1 and P < .05.