Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Aging Phys Act. 2011 Dec 20;20(3):379–394. doi: 10.1123/japa.20.3.379

Table 3.

Participant-Reported Satisfaction With the Study and Its Components

Total sample % rating more highly SI, n = 36 EI, n = 28
Intervention component
 handoutsa 91.7 83.8 100.0
 step logb 95.3 94.4 96.4
 goal settingb 71.9 66.7 78.6
 walking plannerb 59.7 47.2 71.4
 progress chartb 77.8 72.2 85.2
 pedometersb 98.5 100.0 96.4
 groupsa 92.1 86.1 96.4
 overall program to increase walkinga 98.4 100.0 96.4
 will continue to walk at current levelc 98.4 100.0 96.4
 will continue increasing stepsd 89.2 91.7 85.7
 would recommend the program to a friendc 93.7 94.4 92.6
Enhanced intervention components
 step count information sheetsb n/a n/a 85.7
 maps of residenceb n/a n/a 74.1
 maps of neighborhoodb n/a n/a 55.6
 phone callsa n/a n/a 96.4

Note. Note. EI = enhanced intervention; SI = standard intervention. Significance test for the difference between standard and enhanced intervention groups.

a

Percent reporting somewhat, very, or extremely useful.

b

Percent reporting helpful or very helpful.

c

Percent reporting yes.

d

Percent mean reporting somewhat, very, or extremely confident.