Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 28.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Lett. 2014 Jul 25;353(2):272–280. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.07.033

Table 2.

Impact of different metronomic CPA schedules on the number of rebounding and regressing tumors, the frequency of tumor rebound, and the rate of growth of rebounding tumors. Data shown are based on growth curves presented in Fig. 5. Rebounding tumor growth rates were estimated from Fig. 5B based on the number of days required for regressing tumors to return to the mean initial tumor volume prior to CPA treatment (day 0). Tumors in the CPA/6d and CPA(210)/9d groups were combined for these analyses; both groups were treated with the same CPA dose calculated on a per day basis, and they exhibited similar tumor rebound growth frequency (18-25%; mean value for combined group 21%) and rebound growth rate (45-48 days for rebound to initial tumor volume).

CPA schedule Rebounding
tumors
(number)
Regressing
tumors
(number)
p-value a Rebound
frequency
%
Time to rebound to
initial tumor volume
(number of days)
CPA/12d 12 2 0.00030 b 85.7 21-24
CPA/9d 8 6 0.033 57.6 27-33
CPA/6d-9d 3 7 NS 30 27-33
CPA/6d +
CPA(210)/9d
4 15 -- 21.1 45-48
a

: p-value obtained by Fisher’s exact test comparing each group to the combined CPA/6d and CPA(210)/9d group. NS, not significant.

b

: p=0.008 and p=0.0011 for separate comparisons to the CPA/6d and CPA(210)/9d treatment groups, respectively.