Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 16;6(9):419–431. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i9.419

Table 7.

Comparison of stimulation variables by different devices

Device (total number of studies) Operation technique
Electrode implanted layer
Device active after n weeks
Type of pulse
Endoscopy
Postop image
L O E NR M SM Mus SMus SS V NR 0 3 (1) 4 NR Lo T NR UC Y N NR XR E-US B NR
TANTALUS® (8) 8 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 1 0 1 6 1 0 0 6 2 3 0 5 1 0 0 7
IGS-Transcend® (13) 121 21 0 1 0 0 2 4 1 52 (14) 0 43 93 0 0 9 3 (14) 0 7 5 (14) 0 5 15 15 7 (14)
RGES (3) 0 0 3 0 36 36 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 27 27 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 1
Vagal (3) 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 3
Pacing (4) 21 21 2 0 26 16 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 28 18 1 1 4 0 0 2 0 0 2
Total (33) 25 4 5 1 8 4 4 4 5 3 6 (14) 5 9 16 2 4 12 10 (14) 6 17 5 (14) 8 10 1 1 20 (14)
1

Two studies implanted leads either by laparoscopic or open approach;

2

Two studies reported “gastric wall”, but did not specify which particular layer;

3

One study activated its device after 3 or 4 wk, so each category was counted once;

4

No full text for LOSS trial, and this information was also not provided on another study, which reviewed this particular trial;

5

One study did both X-ray and endoscopic USS. Similarly another study did both X-ray and GI Barium test;

6

Implanted electrodes in mucosa and submucosa (3 studies in RGES; 1 study in Gastric Pacing);

7

One study carried out two different pulses;

8

One study carried out two different pulses. L: Laparoscopic; O: Open; E: Endoscopic; NR: Not reported; M: Mucosa; SM: Submucosa; Mus: Muscular; SMus: Seromuscular; SS: Subserosa; V: Vagal nerve; Lo: Long pulse; T: Train of short pulses; UC: Uncertain; Y: Yes; N: No; XR: X-ray; E-US: Endoscopic ultrasound scan; B: Gastrointestinal Barium test.