Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 15.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jun 15;(6):CD004718. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004718.pub3

Comparison 2.

PHASE SPECIFIC TREATMENT (CBT) + NON-SPECIFIC SUPPORTIVE THERAPY vs NON-SPECIFIC SUPPORTIVE THERAPY

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Leaving the study early 1 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 by 12 months 1 60 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.44, 2.16]
1.2 by 3 years 1 60 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.96 [0.60, 1.52]
2 Transition to psychosis - by 12 months 1 60 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.50 [0.15, 1.66]
3 Social Functioning: 1. SAS II endpoint data (long term, high score=worse, LOCF) 1 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 global 1 67 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.40 [−0.05, 0.85]
3.2 social activities 1 67 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.10 [−0.28, 0.48]
3.3 well-being 1 67 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.10 [−0.22, 0.42]
3.4 work 1 67 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) −0.10 [−0.38, 0.18]